2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of colonoscopy in acute lower GI bleeding: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, three meta-analyses including randomized controlled trials [38, 42, 43] found that patients did not show any improvement in ALGIB. However, Shiratori et al [44] reported that early colonoscopy was particularly beneficial for patients with a shock index ≥1 or performance status ≥3 at presentation. Therefore, there may be certain populations that may benefit from early colonoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, three meta-analyses including randomized controlled trials [38, 42, 43] found that patients did not show any improvement in ALGIB. However, Shiratori et al [44] reported that early colonoscopy was particularly beneficial for patients with a shock index ≥1 or performance status ≥3 at presentation. Therefore, there may be certain populations that may benefit from early colonoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic data were collected, including timing of colonoscopy, stigmata of recent haemorrhage (SRH), diagnosis after first colonoscopy, and method of endoscopic haemostasis. Timing of colonoscopy was divided into early (≤ 24 h), elective (24–48 h), and late (48–120 h) [25]. SRH was defined as active bleeding or a densely adherent clot despite vigorous irrigation or a nonbleeding visible vessel on colonoscopy [26, 27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, colonoscopy for acute LGIB was recommended to be performed within 24 h of patient presentation [2,30]. Several recent retrospective studies have failed to show any significant differences in mortality, rebleeding and re-hospitalization for early (<24 h) colonoscopy compared with delayed colonoscopy [31 ▪ ,32–34]. Furthermore, systematic reviews of RCTs have shown that colonoscopy performed within that early timeframe has not been shown to improve clinically relevant outcomes when compared with delayed (>24 h) colonoscopy [35,36].…”
Section: Patient Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%