2001
DOI: 10.17741/bgsf/73.1-2.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of Palaeoproterozoic crustal shearing in the central Fennoscandian Shield according to U-Pb data from associated granitoids, Finland

Abstract: Granitoids in the Finnish part of the Fennoscandian Shield were created by numerous Archaean and Palaeoproterozoic tectonic events. Late phases of Palaeoproterozoic, Svecokarelian deformation created ductile, crustal-scale shear zones, of which the N-S striking Hirvaskoski Shear Zone and the NE-SW striking Oulujärvi Shear Zone were strongly affected by the latest deformation stages, D 3 and D 4 . These shear tectonic events deformed ductilely prekinematic granitoids and caused intrusion of synkinematic igneous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent works by e.g. Lahtinen & Huhma (1997), Nironen (1997), Elliot et al (1998), Korsman et al (1999), Vaasjoki et al (2001), Nironen et al (2002) and Väisänen (2002) have considerably improved our understanding of these events. Zircon ion microprobe studies by Huhma et al (1991) and Claesson et al (1993), and later by Lindh et al (2001), Väisänen et al (2002), Rutland et al (2001aRutland et al ( , 2001bRutland et al ( and 2003, and Weihed et al (2002), indicate the existence of a pre-1.95 Ga Palaeoproterozoic continental crust in different parts of the shield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent works by e.g. Lahtinen & Huhma (1997), Nironen (1997), Elliot et al (1998), Korsman et al (1999), Vaasjoki et al (2001), Nironen et al (2002) and Väisänen (2002) have considerably improved our understanding of these events. Zircon ion microprobe studies by Huhma et al (1991) and Claesson et al (1993), and later by Lindh et al (2001), Väisänen et al (2002), Rutland et al (2001aRutland et al ( , 2001bRutland et al ( and 2003, and Weihed et al (2002), indicate the existence of a pre-1.95 Ga Palaeoproterozoic continental crust in different parts of the shield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak-T conditions are considered to have occurred between ca. 1.87 Ga and 1.85 Ga, although the heating was protracted, with temperatures falling below ~500 ºC only after 1.80 Ga (Kontinen et al, 1992;Peltonen et al, 1996;Tuisku, 1997;Vaasjoki et al, 2001). Blastomylonite textures are characteristic features in sheared rocks of the area, indicating that peak-T conditions were reached under static conditions after the main Svecofennian deformations, which were over before ca.…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blastomylonite textures are characteristic features in sheared rocks of the area, indicating that peak-T conditions were reached under static conditions after the main Svecofennian deformations, which were over before ca. 1.85 Ga (Pajunen & Poutiai nen, 1999;Vaasjoki et al, 2001;Kontinen & Paavola, 2006;Kontinen et al, 2013b,c). The most plausible explanation to the observed Svecofennian heating is tectonic burial of the presently exposed rocks to depths of 15-20 km in association with the 1.9-1.8 Ga folding and thrusting event, although igneous underplating could have been an additional factor (Kontinen et al, 1992(Kontinen et al, , 2013bTuisku, 1997;Korsman et al, 1999;Pajunen & Poutiainen, 1999;Kontinen, 2002;Kontinen & Paavola, 2006;Lahtinen et al, 2010Lahtinen et al, , 2015…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The last major deformation in the OSZ took place at 1.86–1.80 Ga (Kärki ), with 1.80 Ga marking the end of the orogenic evolution in the region (Vaasjoki et al. ). However, the old ductile structures were later reactivated as faults, likely related to the shield‐wide postorogenic extension episodes, including the latest orogenic event affecting the Shield, i.e., the Caledonian (Scandian) orogeny, at 430–400 Ma (e.g., Windley ; Holma, personal communication).…”
Section: Geologic Background and Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%