Men and women differ on performance and strategy on several spatial tasks. Rodents display similar sex differences, and manipulations of early hormone exposure alter the direction of these differences. However, most cognitive testing of nonhuman primates has utilized sample sizes too small to investigate sexually-differentiated behaviors. This study presents an investigation of sex differences and the effects of prenatal androgen on spatial memory and strategy use in rhesus monkeys. Monkeys prenatally exposed to vehicle, testosterone, or the androgen receptor blocker flutamide performed a search task in which 5 of 12 goal boxes contained food rewards. Spatial consistency and the presence of local landmarks were varied. Performance when both spatial and marker cues were available did not differ by sex or prenatal treatment. Contrary to predictions, females easily solved the task when local markers were removed, and their performance outscored males. Although eliminating spatial consistency and requiring subjects to use local markers impaired performance by all monkeys, females continued to locate correct goal boxes at higher than chance levels and scored better than males. Blocking prenatal androgen exposure in males improved use of local markers. These findings suggest that the tendency to attend to landmarks and to use them in solving spatial problems is typical of females across many species, including rodents, humans, and rhesus monkeys. In rhesus monkeys and rodents, developmental androgen eliminates this specialization. However, these results are the only known example of better performance of females than males when salient markers are removed.Keywords rhesus monkey; spatial cognition; sex differences; testosterone; flutamide; prenatal; landmarks On a variety of spatially-demanding tasks, men outperform women. Tests of mental rotation, the ability to imagine the rotation of a two-or three-dimensional object rapidly, provide the largest and most reliable sex differences (Linn and Petersen, 1985), but performance differences exist in other spatial abilities also, including the ability to quickly and accurately learn a described route (Galea and Kimura, 1993;Ward et al., 1986). Not only do differences exist in overall performance, but men and women tend to use different strategies in maplearning and navigation. Men use cardinal directions and mileage estimates more, whereas women rely upon landmarks more (Galea and Kimura, 1993;Lawton, 1994Lawton, , 1996Saucier et al., 2002;Ward et al., 1986). Choice of strategy may be the important difference as route 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Department of Psychology Emory University 532 N. Kilgo Circle Atlanta, Georgia 30322 E-mail: rebecca.herman@gmail.com Phone: 678-637-1357 Fax: 404-727-0372 Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and ...