Timing of Rhyolite Intrusion and Carlin-Type Gold Mineralization at the Cortez Hills Carlin-Type Deposit, Nevada, USA

Abstract

Carlin-type gold deposits (CTDs) of Nevada are the largest producers of gold in the United States, a leader in world gold production. Although much has been resolved about the characteristics and origin of CTDs in Nevada, major questions remain, especially about (1) the role of magmatism, whether only a source of heat or also metals, (2) whether CTDs only formed in the Eocene, and (3) whether pre-Eocene metal concentrations contributed to Eocene deposits. These issues are exemplified by the CTDs of the Cortez region, the second largest concentration of these deposits after the Carlin trend. Carlin-type deposits are notoriously difficult to date because they rarely generate dateable minerals. An age can be inferred from crosscutting relationships with dated dikes and other intrusions, which we have done for the giant Cortez Hills CTD. What we term “Cortez rhyolites” consist of two petrographic-geochemical groups of siliceous dikes: (1) quartz-sanidine-plagioclase-biotite-phyric, high-SiO2 rhyolites emplaced at 35.7 Ma based on numerous 40Ar/39Ar dates and (2) plagioclase-biotite-quartz ± hornblende-phyric, low-SiO2 rhyolites, which probably were emplaced at the same time but possibly as early as ~36.2 Ma. The dikes form a NNW-trending belt that is ~6–10 km wide × 40 km long and centered on the Cortez Hills deposit, and they require an underlying felsic pluton that fed the dikes. Whether these dikes pre- or postdated mineralization has been long debated. We show that dike emplacement spanned the time of mineralization. Many of both high- and low-SiO2 dikes are altered and mineralized, although none constitute ore. In altered-mineralized dikes, plagioclase has been replaced by kaolinite and calcite, and biotite by smectite, calcite, and marcasite. Sanidine is unaltered except in a few samples that are completely altered to quartz and kaolinite. Sulfides present in mineralized dikes are marcasite, pyrite, arsenopyrite, and As-Sb–bearing pyrite. Mineralized dikes are moderately enriched in characteristic Carlin-type elements (Au, Hg, Sb, Tl, As, and S), as well as elements found in some CTDs (Ag, Bi, Cu, Mo), and variably depleted in MgO, CaO, Na2O, K2O, MnO, Rb, Sr, and Ba. In contrast, some high-SiO2 rhyolites are unaltered and cut high-grade ore, which shows that they are post-ore. Both mineralized and post-ore dikes have indistinguishable sanidine 40Ar/39Ar dates. These characteristics, along with published interpretations that other giant CTDs formed in a few tens of thousands of years, indicate the Cortez Hills CTD formed at 35.7 Ma. All Cortez-area CTDs are in or adjacent to the Cortez rhyolite dike swarm, which suggests that the felsic pluton that fed the dikes was the hydrothermal heat source. Minor differences in alteration and geochemistry between dikes and typical Paleozoic sedimentary rock-hosted ore probably reflect low permeability and low reactivity of the predominantly quartzofeldspathic dikes. Despite widespread pre-35.7 Ma mineralization in the Cortez region, including deposits near several CTDs, we find no evidence that older deposits or Paleozoic basinal rocks contributed metals to Cortez-area CTDs. Combining our new information about the age of Cortez Hills with published and our dates on other CTDs demonstrates that CTD formation coincided with the southwestern migration of magmatism across Nevada, supporting a genetic relationship to Eocene magmatism. CTDs are best developed where deep-seated (~6–8 km), probably granitic plutons, expressed in deposits only as dikes, established large, convective hydrothermal systems.

Metallogenic Mechanism of Carlin-Type Gold Deposit in Zhen’an-Xunyang Basin, in the South Qinling of China: Constraints of In Situ Trace Elements and S Isotopes from Newly Discovered Wangzhuang Gold Deposit

“…The Carlin-type gold deposits (CTDs), one of the most significant hydrothermal gold deposits, have attracted considerable attention due to their extensive metallogenic scale and promising exploration potential [1,2]. In recent years, many studies have revealed that some geological and geochemical characteristics of these gold deposits in China differ from those of the most typical Carlin-type gold deposits in Nevada, USA.…”