Timing of State and Territorial COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders and Changes in Population Movement — United States, March 1–May 31, 2020

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is thought to spread from person to person primarily by the respiratory route and mainly through close contact (1). Community mitigation strategies can lower the risk for disease transmission by limiting or preventing personto-person interactions (2). U.S. states and territories began implementing various community mitigation policies in March 2020. One widely implemented strategy was the issuance of orders requiring persons to stay home, resulting in decreased population movement in some jurisdictions (3). Each state or territory has authority to enact its own laws and policies to protect the public's health, and jurisdictions varied widely in the type and timing of orders issued related to stay-at-home requirements. To identify the broader impact of these stay-athome orders, using publicly accessible, anonymized location data from mobile devices, CDC and the Georgia Tech Research Institute analyzed changes in population movement relative to stay-at-home orders issued during March 1-May 31, 2020, by all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and five U.S. territories.* During this period, 42 states and territories issued mandatory stay-at-home orders. When counties subject to mandatory state-and territory-issued stay-at-home orders were stratified along rural-urban categories, movement decreased significantly relative to the preorder baseline in all strata. Mandatory stayat-home orders can help reduce activities associated with the spread of COVID-19, including population movement and close person-to-person contact outside the household. Data on state and territorial stay-at-home orders were obtained from government websites containing executive or administrative orders or press releases for each jurisdiction. Each order was analyzed and coded into one of five mutually exclusive categories: 1) mandatory for all persons; 2) mandatory only for persons in certain areas of the jurisdiction; 3) mandatory only for persons at increased risk in the jurisdiction; 4) mandatory only for persons at increased risk in certain areas of the jurisdiction; or 5) advisory or recommendation (i.e., nonmandatory). Jurisdictions that did not issue an order were coded as having no state-or territory-issued

Reduced social distancing early in the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with antisocial behaviors in an online United States sample

“…Throughout the preceding months, U.S. government officials urged citizens not to buy face masks, but reversed this messaging on April 3 rd to recommend public use of face masks [ 35 ]. Due to these recommendation inconsistencies, unequal access to PPE in the U.S. at the time of data collection, and other research linking psychopathic traits to stockpiling of PPE [ 65 ], our pre-registered analyses focused on the social distancing guidelines and stay-at-home orders that were well established [ 78 ] at the time and affected 94% of the U.S. population [ 31 , 32 ]. Especially because 40.0% of respondents reported never or rarely using PPE in the past week, we suggest caution when drawing conclusions from this variable, as it may simply reflect access to PPE at this particular time point.…”

Policy Interventions, Social Distancing, and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in the United States: A Retrospective State-level Analysis

“…Recent studies have demonstrated that stay-at-home mandates limited social mobility and COVID-19 transmission in the U.S. beyond the timeframe of this study, through May and June. 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 However, it remains unclear whether or not adherence to stay-at-home mandates is sustainable long term, or at what point beyond the initial outbreak the costs of these policies begin to outweigh the benefits. 40…”

The Perceived Impact of COVID-19 among Treatment-Seeking Smokers: A Mixed Methods Approach

“…To reduce the spread of the virus, health organizations and government officials have recommended reducing physical contact, such as keeping at least six feet of space between oneself and others, commonly referred to as “social distancing”, wearing a mask or other facial covering when in public, and more frequent hand washing [ 3 ]. Nearly all states in the United States issued some type of “stay-at-home” or “shelter in place” order to promote social distancing [ 4 ]. Although the specific rules vary by state, and in some cases, by county within specific states, in general, these orders required or recommended that residents stay home except for essential travel, placed restrictions on large gatherings, and either temporarily closed many businesses or required them to operate at reduced capacity.…”