1976
DOI: 10.1306/83d92442-16c7-11d7-8645000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of Tertiary Submarine Canyons and Marine Cycles of Deposition in Southern Sacramento Valley, California: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sediment bodies that have the same geometry and aspect ratio as the channel itself are likely to form only during abandonment of the channel, and often consist of deposits (such as mud plugs due to abandonment or choking by mass transport deposits, or over-spill from an adjacent channel) that do not relate to the activity of the channel as a significant downslope conduit (Almgren, 1978;Elliott, 2000a;Galloway et al, 1991). Where it is possible to determine that a sediment body is the result of continuous migration or aggradation of a single channel we refer to it as a channel fill.…”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediment bodies that have the same geometry and aspect ratio as the channel itself are likely to form only during abandonment of the channel, and often consist of deposits (such as mud plugs due to abandonment or choking by mass transport deposits, or over-spill from an adjacent channel) that do not relate to the activity of the channel as a significant downslope conduit (Almgren, 1978;Elliott, 2000a;Galloway et al, 1991). Where it is possible to determine that a sediment body is the result of continuous migration or aggradation of a single channel we refer to it as a channel fill.…”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Paleogene time, the Great Valley forearc was predominantly a shelved basin, cut by several large submarine canyons (Almgren, 1978; on November 22, 2010 gsabulletin.gsapubs.org Downloaded from Graham and Berry, 1979). Subsequent deposition within the Sacramento basin was nonmarine, whereas the San Joaquin basin continued as a marine basin (Dickinson, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Sacramento Basin, the Martinez Formation ranges in age from above the base of planktonic foraminiferal zone P4 to the lower part of zone P5 (about 58 to 56 Ma) (Almgren, 1984). The San Carlos sand in the San Joaquin Basin is essentially coeval with the more northerly Martinez Formation; in the Vallecitos area (V, fig.…”
Section: [End Moreno Formation]mentioning
confidence: 99%