2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2022.106582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of UHT metamorphism and cooling in south Indian granulites: New P-T-t results from a sapphirine granulite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, similar crustal thickness values of 44–47 km are also noted south of Salem block into Madurai block till AKSZ, suggesting the possible continuation of the Achaean crust south of Palghat‐Cauvery Shearzone System (PCSS). This observation agrees with recent geochronological studies south of PCSS, suggesting the presence of an Archean juvenile crustal component in the western Madurai block (Dev, Tomson, et al., 2022; Dev et al., 2021). However, the timing of the inferred collision between WDC and Salem block has been revised by recent workers at 2.5 Ga, and MBCS has been designated as a late‐Archean collisional boundary assembling Dharwar Craton, Salem, and western Madurai blocks (Brandt et al., 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, similar crustal thickness values of 44–47 km are also noted south of Salem block into Madurai block till AKSZ, suggesting the possible continuation of the Achaean crust south of Palghat‐Cauvery Shearzone System (PCSS). This observation agrees with recent geochronological studies south of PCSS, suggesting the presence of an Archean juvenile crustal component in the western Madurai block (Dev, Tomson, et al., 2022; Dev et al., 2021). However, the timing of the inferred collision between WDC and Salem block has been revised by recent workers at 2.5 Ga, and MBCS has been designated as a late‐Archean collisional boundary assembling Dharwar Craton, Salem, and western Madurai blocks (Brandt et al., 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The weighted mean 206 Pb/ 238 U ages from these domains range from 612 ± 25 Ma to 625 ± 26 Ma, which is interpreted as the timing of mafic magmatism in the area (Table 2). The high MSWD associated with these ages can be due to partial Pb loss during subsequent high-grade metamorphism (Takamura et al 2020) and is reported from the terrane by many workers (Brandt et al, 2014; Dev et al, 2022a). The planar/sector zoned rim domains show distinct low Th/U ratios (<0.5), and ages from this group represents the timing of metamorphism recorded in the mafic granulites bracketed between 573 ± 10 Ma and 540 ± 10 Ma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Single-spot U-Pb isotope and trace element analysis of zircons was performed at the Isotope Geochemistry Facility (IGF), NCESS, using a Teledyne CETAC, Nd:YAG (solid-state laser) coupled with Agilent 7800 quadrupole ICPMS. The analytical protocol is according (Dev et al, 2022a). 91500 zircon was used as the primary standard, whereas Plesovice and BB11 zircons were monitored for quality check.…”
Section: B Zircon U-pb Geochronology Trace Element and Hf Isotope Ana...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is now mounting evidence suggesting a broader timescale of metamorphism, obtained through in situ monazite and zircon geochronology (e.g. Dev et al, 2021Dev et al, , 2022Tiwari & Sarkar, 2020). This has prompted a reconsideration of the hypothesised geodynamic scenario and the style of metamorphism in the MB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%