2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of young radio pulsars – I. Timing noise, periodic modulation, and proper motion

Abstract: The smooth spin-down of young pulsars is perturbed by two non-deterministic phenomenon, glitches and timing noise. Although the timing noise provides insights into nuclear and plasma physics at extreme densities, it acts as a barrier to high-precision pulsar timing experiments. An improved methodology based on Bayesian inference is developed to simultaneously model the stochastic and deterministic parameters for a sample of 85 high-E radio pulsars observed for ∼ 10 years with the 64-m Parkes radio telescope. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
100
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even when removing the deterministic spin-down model, there is a strong red-noise process remaining in the residuals. From the best-fitting model with 4 discrete state switches we estimate α = 3.5(3) and log 10 (A red ) = −5.7(3) which implies spin variations 3 orders of magnitude larger than the long-term red noise processes seen in normal pulsars (Parthasarathy et al 2019), or alternatively that Swift J1818.0−1607 experiences a similar amount of timing noise over our 2-month dataset that a typical pulsar might experience in 10 years. For comparison with other studies, we also report these parameters for a model without any ν and ν changes as α = 5.0(2) and log 10 (A red ) = −4.0(2), although this model is disfavoured in our analysis.…”
Section: Timing and Spin Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Even when removing the deterministic spin-down model, there is a strong red-noise process remaining in the residuals. From the best-fitting model with 4 discrete state switches we estimate α = 3.5(3) and log 10 (A red ) = −5.7(3) which implies spin variations 3 orders of magnitude larger than the long-term red noise processes seen in normal pulsars (Parthasarathy et al 2019), or alternatively that Swift J1818.0−1607 experiences a similar amount of timing noise over our 2-month dataset that a typical pulsar might experience in 10 years. For comparison with other studies, we also report these parameters for a model without any ν and ν changes as α = 5.0(2) and log 10 (A red ) = −4.0(2), although this model is disfavoured in our analysis.…”
Section: Timing and Spin Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The method we use for assessing timing noise strength was developed in parallel with Parthasarathy et al (2019), in which timing noise strength is inferred from the red noise amplitude and spectral index, obtained via parameter estimation with T N , and the observation span as…”
Section: Quantifying Timing Noise Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that of the 4 radio-only pulsars, 3 of them have poor radio timing which means an optimum deep γ-ray search cannot be performed. There is also evidence that rotation irregularities in pulsars scale with the spin parameters and hence closely follow E. Timing noise, which causes phase wander of the timing residuals, can be severe in the high E pulsars (Shannon & Cordes 2010;Parthasarathy et al 2019) which reduces the sensitivity in blind γ-ray searches. Furthermore, the occurrence of abrupt changes in spin period caused by glitches increases for higher values of P/P 2 (Fuentes et al 2017).…”
Section: Where Are the High E γ-Ray Pulsars?mentioning
confidence: 99%