1980
DOI: 10.1080/00221589.1980.11514913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing, selectivity and varietal response to mechanical thinning of apples and pears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fitch (1980) recommended the use of tree shaking to thin plum trees in heavy crop years but cautioned about the potential for tree trunk damage. Menzies (1980) used a tree shaker to thin apple and pear (Pyrus communis L.) trees, but found it to be nonselective in fruit sizes removed; apples and short peduncle pears were effectively thinned. Berlage and Langmo (1977) reported that machine thinning of peach trees with an inertia trunk shaker produced a 57% time savings but resulted in a 30% reduction in yield due to overthinning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitch (1980) recommended the use of tree shaking to thin plum trees in heavy crop years but cautioned about the potential for tree trunk damage. Menzies (1980) used a tree shaker to thin apple and pear (Pyrus communis L.) trees, but found it to be nonselective in fruit sizes removed; apples and short peduncle pears were effectively thinned. Berlage and Langmo (1977) reported that machine thinning of peach trees with an inertia trunk shaker produced a 57% time savings but resulted in a 30% reduction in yield due to overthinning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruit morphology can also play a role in the success of mechanical thinning. Menzies [103] reported that 'Williams', 'Josephine' and, to a lesser extent, 'Beurré Bosc' could be mechanically thinned successfully, but found that the long flexible peduncle of 'Packham's Triumph' was a major limitation in mechanically thinning this cultivar. However, Seehuber et al [102] attributed successful mechanical thinning of 'Conference' and 'Alexander Lucas' cultivars partly to the steep upright long peduncles, particularly when compared with the shorter flower stalks of apples.…”
Section: Mechanical Thinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical and hand thinning have been reported to be equally effective in reducing the proportion of small fruit in 'Williams' pears [103]. One advantage of mechanical thinning is the saving in hand-thinning labour costs, the cost of mechanical thinning has been reported to be half that of hand thinning based on 20 ha and 10 years depreciation of the mechanical thinner [102].…”
Section: Mechanical Thinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the fruit yield might be reduced after fruit thinning but it helps to produce more marketable fruits. To keep producing marketable fruit and to ensure regular cropping it is essential to reduce the number of developing fruits in "on" years (Menzies, 1980). Buwalda et al (1989) reported that leaving trees un-thinned increased the incidence of natural drop before harvest, and this presumably resulted in the reduced fruit yield, which may be responsible for the apparent yield drop in non-thinning treatments.…”
Section: Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%