First-principles
calculation and Bramfitt misfit theory are employed
to investigate the interface evolution between the precipitated titanium
oxide inclusions and forming ferrite in steels. The results showed
that there are nine possible stacking sites (Ti–O-1, Ti–O-2,
Ti–O-3, Ti–Ti-1, Ti–Ti-2, Ti–Ti-3, O–Ti-1,
O–Ti-2, and O–Ti-3) for the Fe(110)/Ti2O3(001) interface and three stacking sites (O-1, Ti-1, and Ti-2)
for Fe(100)/TiO2(110). Among them, Ti–O-1, Ti–Ti-1,
and O–Ti-3 are stable interfaces, while Ti–O-2, Ti–O-3,
Ti–Ti-2, Ti–Ti-3, O–Ti-1, and O–Ti-2 are
metastable interfaces, which have a tendency to transform into stable
interfaces in the Fe(110)/Ti2O3(001) system.
The Ti–O-1 interface has the largest adhesion work and the
lowest interface energy value in all stable interfaces of Fe(110)/Ti2O3(001), which leads to the maximum possibility
of ferrite nucleation on the Ti2O3 surface.
Although all interfaces are stable in the Fe(100)/TiO2(110)
system, they have negative adhesion work and quite large interface
energy values, causing the fact that TiO2 inclusion cannot
promote ferrite nucleation. When ferrite nucleates on the Ti–O
terminal Ti2O3(001) surface, it preferentially
forms the Ti–O-3 interface and then transforms into the Ti–O-1
interface with increasing Fe atoms. Furthermore, the substitution
and vacancy formation energy of Mn-doped Ti2O3 show that Ti2O3 inclusions can absorb Mn atoms
in the form of occupying Ti atom vacancies.