2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tin(IV) Compounds with 2-C6F4PPh2 Substituents and Their Reactivity toward Palladium(0): Formation of Tin–Palladium Complexes via Oxidative Addition

Abstract: The tin(IV) compounds MeSn(2-CFPPh) (1, x = 1; 2, x = 2) and ClSn(2-CFPPh) (3) were obtained from the reactions of 2-LiCFPPh with MeSnCl (3:1), MeSnCl (2:1), or SnCl (3:1), respectively. The reactions of 2-LiCFPPh with SnCl in different stoichiometric ratios (4:1-1:1) gave 3 as the main product. Compound ClSn(2-CFPPh) (4) was formed in the transmetalation reaction of 3 and [AuCl(tht)] but could not be isolated. 1 and 2 react with palladium(0) sources {[Pd(PPh)] and [Pd(allyl)Cp]} by the oxidative addition of o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the subsequent HCl elimination was significantly endergonic (Δ G ° = 16.5 kcal/mol), it is likely that PPh 3 acts as an acceptor and/or scavenger of HCl to make the reaction feasible in a way similar to that proposed for the Sn–F bond cleavage . DFT computational results of Sn–Cl bond activation are basically consistent with the early study on Sn–Cl bond activation by Pt complexes, in which S N 2-type pathway was proposed . The mechanistic difference between Sn–F and Sn–Cl bond activation would be attributed to the bonding natures of the Ir → Sn–X interactions, and the simultaneous formation of strong H–F bond appears to be required for the cleavage of stronger Sn–F bond than Sn–Cl bond.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although the subsequent HCl elimination was significantly endergonic (Δ G ° = 16.5 kcal/mol), it is likely that PPh 3 acts as an acceptor and/or scavenger of HCl to make the reaction feasible in a way similar to that proposed for the Sn–F bond cleavage . DFT computational results of Sn–Cl bond activation are basically consistent with the early study on Sn–Cl bond activation by Pt complexes, in which S N 2-type pathway was proposed . The mechanistic difference between Sn–F and Sn–Cl bond activation would be attributed to the bonding natures of the Ir → Sn–X interactions, and the simultaneous formation of strong H–F bond appears to be required for the cleavage of stronger Sn–F bond than Sn–Cl bond.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Scheme 5 shows that stannanes of type J can lead to PSnP stannyl palladium(II)complexes via oxidative addition of Sn−C or Sn−Cl bonds [73] . The oxidative addition of the Sn−C Me bond of J was not observed.…”
Section: Synthetic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSiP, PSiN, and NSiN pincer complexes have been studied for Si–H bond activation, C–H borylation of arenes, hydrocarboxylation of allenes, dehydrogenative borylation, fluorosilane activation, and hydroborylation of CO 2 . A PGeP pincer complex of Pd has been studied as a catalyst for the hydrocarboxylation of allenes and the hydrometallation of ethylene . The heterobimetallic bonding interaction between the group 14 element (E = Ge or Sn, sometimes referred to as “tetrel”) and Ni, Pd, or Pt in SES and PEP complexes has been studied (E = group 14 element). PEP (E = Si, Ge, and Sn) complexes of Pd were demonstrated to be active catalysts for a reductive aldol-type reaction . PSnP complexes of group 10 metals undergo Sn–Cl bond activation and alkyl transfer .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%