Tinkering as Collective Practice: A Qualitative Study on Handling Ethical Tensions in Supporting People with Intellectual or Psychiatric Disabilities

Abstract

The values of patient autonomy and community participation have become central in health care. However, care practices involve a plurality of possibly conflicting values. These values often transgress the borders of the individual professional-client relationship as they involve family members, other professionals and community organisations. Good care should acknowledge this relational complexity, which requires a collective handling of the tensions between values. To better understand this process, we draw on [Mol, A. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge; Mol, A., I. Moser, and J. Pols. 2010a. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Transcript Verlag.) by developing the notion of collective tinkering. An ethnographic study was conducted in two teams in community housing services for people with Intellectual Disabilities and Severe Mental Illness. Collective tinkering is analysed (1) within teams;(2) between professionals, family members and professionals from different organisations providing care for the same client; and (3) in organising practices for a collective of clients. Collective tinkering involves assembling goods into a care practice, attentively experimenting with these care practices, and adjusting care accordingly within a collective of those involved in care for a particular client (group). When collective tinkering does not occur, the stakeholders excluded (e.g. clients or family members) may experience poor quality of care.

Toward a Values‐Informed Approach to Complexity in Health Care: Hermeneutic Review

“…Because of the unique, emergent, and multifaceted nature of real‐world situations, generalizable knowledge (e.g., from randomized controlled trials) and standardized interventions (even if “evidence based” and “theory informed”) can inform but not determine action 126 . Real‐world challenges require an ongoing cycle of data collection, analysis, and “tinkering” (trying things out and seeing if they work).…”

Bedtime negotiations: Unravelling normative complexity in hospital‐based prevention

“…The results indicate that implementing a preventative innovation requires intensive justification work. Actors need to engage in the ongoing creative work of tying together different justifications and dealing with normative complexity (Heerings et al., 2022b). Pragmatic sociology, we argue, provides a valuable toolkit for understanding the normative complexities of health‐care innovation.…”

How Stories Can Contribute Toward Quality Improvement in Long-Term Care

“…By including a diverse group of stakeholders in quality improvement processes, tensions between these perspectives can be made visible ( Sion, et al, 2019 ). Reflection and deliberation on these differences may lead to quality improvement initiatives that are more broadly supported ( Heerings et al, 2022b ).…”