2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0669-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tinnitus functional index: validation of the German version for Switzerland

Abstract: BackgroundDifferent standardized questionnaires are used to assess tinnitus severity, making comparisons across studies difficult. These questionnaires are also used to measure treatment-related changes in tinnitus although they were not designed for this purpose. To solve these problems, a new questionnaire - the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - has been established. The TFI is highly responsive to treatment-related change and promises to be the new gold standard in tinnitus evaluation. The aim of the curren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
19
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ) and, thus, the non-significant results. The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), which has been specifically developed as a treatment-responsive measure ( Meikle et al, 2012 ) and recently validated ( Peter et al, 2017 ), might have been more suitable to cover treatment-related changes in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ) and, thus, the non-significant results. The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), which has been specifically developed as a treatment-responsive measure ( Meikle et al, 2012 ) and recently validated ( Peter et al, 2017 ), might have been more suitable to cover treatment-related changes in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have also failed to reproduce the original eight factor structure. For example, in the validation of the Polish TFI [24] and German TFI [23], 5 factors were identified; and in the Swedish TFI [28] validation, 6 factors were extracted; in the Dutch version TFI 7 factors were found [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor matrix was rotated to determine the items corresponding to each dimension, and the items with the highest commonality on the scale were evaluated. Factor analysis was carried out using the oblique rotation [16,23,24]. The McDonald's omega, including hierarchical subscale and omega total, are also used to further evaluate the dimensionality of the scale [25].…”
Section: Validity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor 2 comprises the original Cognitive (7-9), Quality of Life (19)(20)(21)(22) and Emotional (23,25) items. Factor 3 includes the three Auditory items (13)(14)(15). Factor 4 contains the Sleep (10)(11)(12) and Relaxation items (16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its publication, the TFI has received considerable international attention in both clinical and research settings and has become the new "gold standard". It has been translated into and validated in a number of languages including Dutch 12 , Polish 13 , Swedish 14 , German 15,16 , Hebrew 17 and Chinese 18,19 . To our knowledge, there has been no validated Italian version to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%