2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00343-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tinnitus in hamsters following exposure to intense sound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
112
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
112
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Undesirable learning effects can reduce the magnitude of positive test results over repeated sessions (Heffner and Harrington 2002;Kaltenbach et al 2004) and ultimately will lead to false negative test results. That is, a subset of rats with tinnitus may display normal GPIASR because they have learned effective listening strategies for gap detection.…”
Section: Adequacy Of Behavioral Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undesirable learning effects can reduce the magnitude of positive test results over repeated sessions (Heffner and Harrington 2002;Kaltenbach et al 2004) and ultimately will lead to false negative test results. That is, a subset of rats with tinnitus may display normal GPIASR because they have learned effective listening strategies for gap detection.…”
Section: Adequacy Of Behavioral Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since pharmacological agents may induce specific patterns of abnormal activity in the central auditory system they are not necessarily a good model for the more common forms of TI. When noise trauma is used to induce TI, its effects are much more variable across individual animals (Heffner and Harrington, 2002). Thus, while noise trauma may provide a more appropriate model for TI in humans, its use in the laboratory is not so popular.…”
Section: Guiding Principles From Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This predisposition is usually observed in one of two behavioral contexts. In a conditioned suppression paradigm, tinnitus-positive animals begin to drink in silence after they have been trained to drink only in the presence of sound (Brennan and Jastreboff, 1991;Bauer et al, 1999;Heffner and Harrington, 2002;Lobarinas et al, 2004). In a gap detection paradigm, tinnitus-positive animals show less gap prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex (GPIAS), presumably because tinnitus Bfills in the gap^that signals the impending presentation of a startle-eliciting stimulus (Turner et al, 2006;Lobarinas et al, 2013;Longenecker et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%