2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.yofte.2018.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TiO2 thin film temperature sensor monitored by smartphone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the effect of the temperature, the disturbance created on the guided light can result in either an intensity variation [ 79,80 ] or a spectral shift. [ 93 ] In the latter, it requires the coupling of a diffraction grating to convert the spectral shift into an angular deviation that can be monitored through the position of the illuminated pixel, quantified from an image. This disturbance is afterward correlated with temperature to characterize the sensor.…”
Section: Optical Temperature Sensors For the Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the effect of the temperature, the disturbance created on the guided light can result in either an intensity variation [ 79,80 ] or a spectral shift. [ 93 ] In the latter, it requires the coupling of a diffraction grating to convert the spectral shift into an angular deviation that can be monitored through the position of the illuminated pixel, quantified from an image. This disturbance is afterward correlated with temperature to characterize the sensor.…”
Section: Optical Temperature Sensors For the Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of the smartphone-based interrogation system, similar to most of the already known smartphone-based spectrometers (SPBS) [12], [13], [16] is depicted in Fig. 1(a).…”
Section: Smartphone-based Cfbg Interrogation Prototypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5 ] By analyzing the shift in the histogram for the red and green channels after ultraviolet (UV) excitation, they were able to determine the temperature of the label between 283–317 K with an impressive average sensitivity of 5%/K and a temperature resolution better than 0.2 K. [ 5a ] Earlier work showed temperature sensing at the tip of a fiber probe was possible with a diffraction grating and smartphone (range of 263–453 K). [ 6 ] More broadly, there is a broad and successful ongoing literature demonstrating the effectiveness of quantitative analysis of photoluminescence (PL) intensity or color with a smartphone for chemical assays, [ 7 ] and anti‐counterfeiting purposes. [ 8 ] For example, a lateral flow assay using SrAl 2 O 4 :Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ nanophosphors with persistent luminescence allowed the intensity of light emitted in the test and control strips to be quantitatively determined after the smartphone flash excitation was turned off.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%