2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/6029258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TISNet-Enhanced Fully Convolutional Network with Encoder-Decoder Structure for Tongue Image Segmentation in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Abstract: Extracting the tongue body accurately from a digital tongue image is a challenge for automated tongue diagnoses, as the blurred edge of the tongue body, interference of pathological details, and the huge difference in the size and shape of the tongue. In this study, an automated tongue image segmentation method using enhanced fully convolutional network with encoder-decoder structure was presented. In the frame of the proposed network, the deep residual network was adopted as an encoder to obtain dense feature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RAFF-Net could adapt well to the interference of different tongue shapes and differences in tooth mark details. Compared with UNet and other tongue segmentation model, 9,15,17,42,43 our model RAFF-Net improved MIoU by 1.54%, 2.63%, 0.70%, 6.18%, 1.70%. The comparison between the improved algorithm RAFF-Net and OETNet 9 in this article revealed that RAFF-Net had fewer numbers of parameters, and the computing time of both was basically comparable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…RAFF-Net could adapt well to the interference of different tongue shapes and differences in tooth mark details. Compared with UNet and other tongue segmentation model, 9,15,17,42,43 our model RAFF-Net improved MIoU by 1.54%, 2.63%, 0.70%, 6.18%, 1.70%. The comparison between the improved algorithm RAFF-Net and OETNet 9 in this article revealed that RAFF-Net had fewer numbers of parameters, and the computing time of both was basically comparable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The performance of the latest improved models related to tongue segmentation was also compared, involving several tongue segmentation models mentioned in the literature. 9,15,17,42,43 To ensure the objectivity of the model performance judging metrics, seven metrics, MIoU, F1-score, Recall, Precision, number of parameters, MFLOPs, and Runtime, were chosen for a comprehensive comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last two years, tongue image segmentation algorithms have been developed based on traditional tongue image segmentation methods and deep learning algorithms. To solve the problems of edge blurring and detail interference during tongue extraction, Huang et al 112 designed an automatic tongue image segmentation method using an enhanced full convolutional network with an encoderdecoder structure with an average sensitivity of 98.97%, which is better than the four algorithms SegNet, FCN, PSPNet, and DeepLab v3 + . Gao et al 113 proposed LSM-SEC based on convolutional neural networks as a model combining symmetric and edge-constrained level sets of tongue geometric features for tongue segmentation, which is suitable for tongue image segmentation under most conditions and can also improve the accuracy of subsequent model evolution.…”
Section: Deep-learning-based Tongue Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method based on deep learning can acquire more image features and has better performance. Huang et al [ 21 ] proposed an automatic tongue image segmentation based on an enhanced full convolutional network. Qu et al [ 22 ] proposed an image quality evaluation method based on brightness statistics to determine whether the input image needs to be segmented and used SegNet to train the tongue dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%