“…This variation in bone formation related to the origin of the bone graft has been attributed to a difference in bony architecture, with a greater fraction of cortical bone in the mesenchymal-derived graft (Zins and Whitacker, 1983;Kusiak et al, 1985;Hardesty and Marsh, 1990;Chen et al, 1994;Pinholt et al, 1994). In future, tissue engineering approaches and osteopromotive substances may offer methods with minimal or no donor site morbidity (Jones et al, 2007;Moreau et al, 2007). Resorption is also dependent on functional loading since a long lasting period without tooth migration into the grafted bone will result in further boneloss, because absence of functional loading leads to disuse atrophy of the graft (Bergland et al, 1986;Schultze-Mosgau et al, 2003;Feichtinger et al, 2006, Ozawa et al, 2007.…”