2003
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000099966.51485.5f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1, −2, and −3 Polymorphisms in a White Population With Intracranial Aneurysms

Abstract: Background and Purpose-Remodeling of the extracellular matrix seems to be a crucial event in the pathogenesis of cerebral aneurysms. Matrix metalloproteinases are the most important degrading enzymes in the extracellular matrix. Their activity is controlled predominantly by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). To investigate the possible impact of genetic variants within the genes encoding TIMP-1, -2, and -3, we conducted this case-control study. Methods-A study sample was analyzed that comprised 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matrix metalloproteinase-7 À181A4G was the only polymorphism differently distributed among gastric carcinoma patients compared with control subjects: AA 43.0%, AG 46.8%, and GG 10.1% in patients vs AA 27.2%, AG 62.7% and GG 10.1% in controls (Po0.04; Table 2). Comparison of the genotype distribution of our Caucasian control subjects with those published on other mainly Asiatic control groups (Wollmer et al, 2002;Ghilardi et al, 2003;Krex et al, 2003;Miao et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2004;Zhou et al, 2004;Matsumura et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2005) showed significant differences for MMP-2 À1306C4T , MMP-7 À181A4G , TIMP-1 372C4T and TIMP-2 À418G4C (Table 3). All the SNPs were evaluated for association with the clinicopathological parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Matrix metalloproteinase-7 À181A4G was the only polymorphism differently distributed among gastric carcinoma patients compared with control subjects: AA 43.0%, AG 46.8%, and GG 10.1% in patients vs AA 27.2%, AG 62.7% and GG 10.1% in controls (Po0.04; Table 2). Comparison of the genotype distribution of our Caucasian control subjects with those published on other mainly Asiatic control groups (Wollmer et al, 2002;Ghilardi et al, 2003;Krex et al, 2003;Miao et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2004;Zhou et al, 2004;Matsumura et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2005) showed significant differences for MMP-2 À1306C4T , MMP-7 À181A4G , TIMP-1 372C4T and TIMP-2 À418G4C (Table 3). All the SNPs were evaluated for association with the clinicopathological parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Several have evaluated multiple MMP or TIMP SNPs. ( [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] ) Some of the studies failed to replicate prior findings ( 15,16,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), perhaps because of differences in study endpoints, small population sizes, differing study designs (e.g., cohort vs. matched controls), failure to account for epistasis (gene interactions: e.g., MMP-1 and MMP-3), and unmeasured intra-genic allelic heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other cardiovascular studies have recently used an incarnation of this methodology but only investigated clinical phenotypes in afterthought. ( 29,30 ) Finally, prior studies of MMP and TIMP genes studied populations of around one hundred ( 10,17,25 ), multiple hundreds ( 11,12,13,16,18,19,21 ), between 1,000-1,700 participants. ( 14,15,20,(22)(23)(24)27 ) While the current study of >5,000 patients did not replicate all of those prior studies' findings, it improved on their sample sizes by 3-to 50-fold.…”
Section: Genetic and Allelic Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genotype variants were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) methodology for all the SNPs. Primer sequences, PCR conditions and the restriction enzymes used have been described elsewhere for both MMP2 and TIMP2 [12][13][14][15]. Positive and negative controls were used in each genotyping assay, and 5 % of the samples were randomly selected and run in duplicates with 100 % concordance.…”
Section: Mmp-2 (-735c [ T) [Rs 2285053] and Timp-2 (-418g [ C) [Rs 81mentioning
confidence: 99%