2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Sampling and Homogenization in the Sub-Microliter Scale with a Nanosecond Infrared Laser (NIRL) for Mass Spectrometric Proteomics

Abstract: It was recently shown that ultrashort pulse infrared (IR) lasers, operating at the wavelength of the OH vibration stretching band of water, are highly efficient for sampling and homogenizing biological tissue. In this study we utilized a tunable nanosecond infrared laser (NIRL) for tissue sampling and homogenization with subsequent liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis for mass spectrometric proteomics. For the first time, laser sampling was performed with murine spleen and colon t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to our most recent study [ 26 ], where 1617 proteins were identified from murine colon tissue, using a similar setup, we demonstrated a significant increase in the number of identified proteins (3053) for a comparable ablation volume (approximately 0.6 µL). This increased efficiency can be explained by direct trapping of the aerosol on a glass slide above the tissue sample and reducing the scanning area for the laser ablation by shifting of sample repeatedly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to our most recent study [ 26 ], where 1617 proteins were identified from murine colon tissue, using a similar setup, we demonstrated a significant increase in the number of identified proteins (3053) for a comparable ablation volume (approximately 0.6 µL). This increased efficiency can be explained by direct trapping of the aerosol on a glass slide above the tissue sample and reducing the scanning area for the laser ablation by shifting of sample repeatedly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Besides PIRL [ 21 , 22 , 23 ] and microsecond infrared laser (MIRL) [ 23 ]. especially nanosecond infrared lasers (NIRL) with a pulse duration of about 7 ns, have been successfully utilized for tissue sampling prior to proteome analysis [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. In the recent study by our group, Hahn et al [ 26 ] revealed the clear distinguishability of murine colon and spleen tissue, based on >1000 identified proteins after collecting NIRL-induced tissue aerosols as condensates on glass cover slips, followed by bottom-up proteomics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 − 42 IR laser ablation and capture has been demonstrated for proteomic analysis from millimeter-sized tissue regions with a sampling spot size of approximately 200 μm. 43 45 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mid-IR lasers with wavelengths ∼3 μm are efficient for ablation of biological tissue because of wavelength overlap with OH vibrational absorption of water molecules . Laser heating of the water in the tissue leads to a rapid volumetric phase change and ablation of the irradiated region, resulting in removal of the disrupted tissue; no significant biomolecule fragmentation has been reported. IR laser ablation and capture has been demonstrated for proteomic analysis from millimeter-sized tissue regions with a sampling spot size of approximately 200 μm. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used buffers for protein extraction are SDS and UA buffer, which readily solubilize most proteins in different clinical samples [36,37]. Commonly used extraction methods include ultrasonic instruments and homogenate instruments, which promote sample fragmentation and protein dissolution [38,39]. The selection of an appropriate buffer and extraction instrument will help us extract adequate proteins for precise qualitative and quantitative analyses in clinical samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%