2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(2000)35:2<139::aid-em9>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue-specific activities of methylated dibenzo[c,g]carbazoles in mice: Carcinogenicity, DNA adduct formation, and CYP1A induction in liver and skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with this assumption, B[ a ]P should be more prone to photoexcitation than DBC derivatives according to the E gap value. However, the addition of methyl group(s) at the ring carbon atoms or NH group of DBC does not only affect the carcinogenic specificity of the particular DBC derivative [Szafarz et al, ; Taras‐Valero et al, ], but might also slightly alter their electronic structure and UVA excitation efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Along with this assumption, B[ a ]P should be more prone to photoexcitation than DBC derivatives according to the E gap value. However, the addition of methyl group(s) at the ring carbon atoms or NH group of DBC does not only affect the carcinogenic specificity of the particular DBC derivative [Szafarz et al, ; Taras‐Valero et al, ], but might also slightly alter their electronic structure and UVA excitation efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substitutions at different aromatic ring carbons or heterocyclic nitrogen by methyl groups are known to substantially affect DBC metabolism and are believed to underlie the tissue specificity of particular DBC derivatives. The parent compound DBC displays both sarcomagenic and hepatocarcinogenic activities [Warshawsky et al, ], whereas its methyl derivatives, DiMeDBC and N ‐MeDBC, manifest specific tropism to the liver and skin, respectively [Renault et al, ; Tombolan et al, ; Taras‐Valero et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%