2012
DOI: 10.3390/ma5091528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Titanium as a Reconstruction and Implant Material in Dentistry: Advantages and Pitfalls

Abstract: Commercial pure titanium (cpTi) has been the material of choice in several disciplines of dentistry due to its biocompatibility, resistance to corrosion and mechanical properties. Despite a number of favorable characteristics, cpTi as a reconstruction and oral implant material has several shortcomings. This paper highlights current knowledge on material properties, passive oxidation film formation, corrosion, surface activation, cell interactions, biofilm development, allergy, casting and machining properties … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
106
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
3
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although they are stiffer than bone, their modulus of elasticity is closer to bone than any other implant material, with the exception of pure titanium. 3 This lower modulus of elasticity is desirable, as it results in a more favourable stress distribution at the boneimplant interface. 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although they are stiffer than bone, their modulus of elasticity is closer to bone than any other implant material, with the exception of pure titanium. 3 This lower modulus of elasticity is desirable, as it results in a more favourable stress distribution at the boneimplant interface. 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the composition and heat treatment, both the alpha and beta forms may coexist. 2,3 Ti-6Al-4V, the alloy of present study is a 'α + β' type of titanium alloy. This alloy was introduced in 1954 and is often known as the 'Work Horse' alloy of Titanium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Young's modulus of these materials is higher than that of mineralized tissue. Furthermore, the traditional structure of titanium for medical and dental implants is non-porous; this dense structure of implants can cause a mismatch between the Young's modulus of the titanium implant (110 GPa) and natural cortical (17)(18)(19)(20) and cancellous bone (around 4 GPa) [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics make them perfect candidates for bone substitute in biomedical implants, where the properties of these foams can be tailored depending on the amount of porosity introduced to match that of the surrounding tissue or bone, thus avoiding the stress shielding problem. This phenomenon results from the nonuniform partitioning of load between the implant and the surrounding tissue or bone and is one of the major causes of failure in implants [2]. This inhomogeneity in load transfer occurs due to the large difference between the elastic moduli of the dense implant and the surrounding tissue or bone, where the dense material of the implant carries stresses without transmitting them into the bone, thus shielding it and leading to its disintegration in the body environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%