Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings

Pedersen, Elin Rønby; McCall, Kim; Moran, Thomas P.; Halasz, Frank G.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-051574-8.50053-4

Cited by 121 publications

(137 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

129

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Buxton offered early insights into the cognitive functions, such as "chunking," that gestures may play in interaction [17]. Since the 1990s, stroke gestures as an interaction modality have been explored in a wide range of research prototypes for different application domains in the HCI research literature [25,95,128].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Foundational Issues in Touch-Surface Stroke Gesture Design — An Integrative Review

Zhai

2012

FNT in Human–Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Foundational Issues in Touch-Surface Stroke Gesture Design — An Integrative Review

Zhai

2012

FNT in Human–Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Firstly, the Liveboard and especially its applications developed at XEROX PARC avoid handwriting recognition except that for gestures (Pedersen 1993). On the other hand, we employ handwriting recognition, which is essential to compile and execute handwritten programs, to exploit the power of computing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Liveboard by XEROX is well-known as such a system (Elrod et al 1992, Pedersen et al 1993, Weiser 1991, 1993.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human Interface and Applications on IdeaBoard

Nakagawa

Oguni

Yoshino

1997

Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT ’97

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes a new style of human interface and several applications on an interactive dynamic whiteboard. If current GUIs are just expanded to the whiteboard size, the teacher would have to frequently move from side to side and stretch their hands from edge to edge, as well as the teacher's body would cover the board. In order to avoid these problems, operability from an arbitrary standing position of the teacher with a reasonable amount of hand movement, thus no hiding of the board by the body, and easy operations by electronic markers have been sought. Moreover, various applications have been prototyped. A programming education system is one of these, where the teacher writes a program on the board and can have it recognized, compiled and executed in front of the students. Another is an arithmetic education system where children write arithmetic equations on the board and the system answers them.

show abstract

“…Previous research projects involving large display workspaces indicate benefits may exist in using large displays to support general collaborative design tasks such as brainstorming sessions [25,22,9,30]. Two projects in particular, Portfolio Wall [5] and Designers' Outpost [15], emphasize the potential of large display workspaces in supporting domain-specific design decisions.…”

Section: Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Tivoli [25] project started in the early 90's at Xerox r PARC as one of the first research projects to explore applications of large interactive displays. Tivoli is the software designed to run on Liveboard, a 46" x 32" electronic whiteboard, which was one of the first large display systems to consider input devices beyond the typical keyboard and mouse.…”

Section: Tivoli At Xerox Parcmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mixed-Fidelity Prototyping of User Interfaces

Petrie

Schneider

Interactive Systems. Design, Specification, and Verification

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research presents a new technique for user interface prototyping, called mixedfidelity prototyping. Mixed-fidelity prototyping combines low-, medium-, and highfidelity interface elements within a single prototype in a lightweight manner, supporting independent refinement of individual elements. The approach allows designers to investigate alternate designs, including more innovative designs, and elicit feedback from stakeholders without having to commit too early in the process. As well, the approach encourages collaboration among a diverse group of stakeholders throughout the design process. For example, individuals who specialize in specific fidelities, such as high-fidelity components, are able to become involved earlier on in the process.We developed a conceptual model called the Region Model and implemented a proof-of-concept system called ProtoMixer. We demonstrated the mixed-fidelity approach by using ProtoMixer to design an example application.ProtoMixer has several benefits over other existing prototyping tools. With ProtoMixer, prototypes can be composed of multiple fidelities, and elements are easily refined and transitioned between different fidelities. Individual elements can be tied into data and functionality, and can be executed inside prototypes. As well, traditional informal practices such as sketching and storyboarding are supported. Furthermore, ProtoMixer is designed for collaborative use on a high-resolution, large display workspace.ii

show abstract

Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings

Cited by 121 publications

References 7 publications

Foundational Issues in Touch-Surface Stroke Gesture Design — An Integrative Review

Foundational Issues in Touch-Surface Stroke Gesture Design — An Integrative Review

Human Interface and Applications on IdeaBoard

Mixed-Fidelity Prototyping of User Interfaces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About