Type I IFNs are induced in response to viral infection in two phases of innate immune signaling. The first occurs when pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) activate either cytosolic or membrane-bound pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). These interactions stimulate signaling pathways that eventually converge on the activation of the transcription factors IRF3, IRF7, and/or NF-B, which lead to the transcription of early type I IFN subtypes. In mice, these early subtypes consist of IFN- and IFN-␣4 (2). However, in humans, it is not known exactly which type I IFN subtypes are induced early. These early subtypes are secreted from the cells and bind to the IFN receptor (IFNAR), which stimulates the phosphorylation of the receptor-associated kinases JAK1 and Tyk2 and subsequently the transcription factors STAT1 and STAT2. Serine phosphorylation of STAT proteins also occurs and is required for optimal transcriptional activity (3). These phosphorylated STATs complex with IRF9 to form the interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) complex, which translocates into the nucleus to activate the transcription of hundreds of ISGs, IRF7, and additional type I IFNs to amplify the response (4-6). This positive-feedback amplification loop continues until negative regulators of IFN signaling, such as SOCS proteins and IRF2, become activated.Sendai virus (SeV) has long been used to study type I IFN regulation due to its robust ability to induce large quantities of the type I IFN subtypes (7-9). Reports studying the transcriptional regulation of the IFN-␣ subtypes in response to SeV infection have indicated that IRF3 and IRF7 play central roles (1). In these stud- Citation Zaritsky LA, Bedsaul JR, Zoon KC. 2015. Virus multiplicity of infection affects type I interferon subtype induction profiles and interferon-stimulated genes.