Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XX 2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.485198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TMAH soak process optimization with DNQ positive resist for lift-off applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking λ = 365.4 nm as the principal wavelength absorbed by the AZ MiR 703 photoresist (corresponding to the i-line of the mercury vapor light source), the theoretical resolution limits for the 5×, 10×, and 20× lenses are ∼1.4, ∼0.7, and ∼0.4 μm, respectively. Minimum reproducible feature sizes as small as ∼0.5 μm have been demonstrated for AZ MiR 703, though the work herein did not obtain features smaller than ∼0.9 μm . The experimentally obtained feature sizes were slightly larger than expected, which could have been a result of the limitations from the minimum resolution of the objective lenses (e.g., due to the manufacturing aberrations therein).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking λ = 365.4 nm as the principal wavelength absorbed by the AZ MiR 703 photoresist (corresponding to the i-line of the mercury vapor light source), the theoretical resolution limits for the 5×, 10×, and 20× lenses are ∼1.4, ∼0.7, and ∼0.4 μm, respectively. Minimum reproducible feature sizes as small as ∼0.5 μm have been demonstrated for AZ MiR 703, though the work herein did not obtain features smaller than ∼0.9 μm . The experimentally obtained feature sizes were slightly larger than expected, which could have been a result of the limitations from the minimum resolution of the objective lenses (e.g., due to the manufacturing aberrations therein).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimum reproducible feature sizes as small as ∼0.5 μm have been demonstrated for AZ MiR 703, though the work herein did not obtain features smaller than ∼0.9 μm. 41 The experimentally obtained feature sizes were slightly larger than expected, which could have been a result of the limitations from the minimum resolution of the objective lenses (e.g., due to the manufacturing aberrations therein). Optimal exposure times for the creation of the projected pattern of crossed bars using the 5×, 10×, and 20× objective lenses were 58, 20, and 20 s, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This step leaves the film which was deposited directly on the substrate into the phoresist cavity. So far liftoff has been performed in three ways: the single-layer method 5 , the multi-layer method 6 and the surface-modified method 7,8 . The single-layer method, involve a negative tone photoresist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During lift-off, the sacrificial layer under the film is removed with a solvent, taking off the film on the sacrificial layer, leaving only the film which was deposited directly on the substrate. Historically, there were three basic ways in which lift-off could be performed: the single-layer method [1][2][3], the multi-layer method [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and the surface-modified method [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%