Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015) 2015
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s15-2068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TMUNSW: Identification of Disorders and Normalization to SNOMED-CT Terminology in Unstructured Clinical Notes

Abstract: Unstructured clinical notes are rich sources for valuable patient information. Information extraction techniques can be employed to extract this valuable information, which in turn can be used to discover new knowledge. Named entity recognition and normalization are the basic tasks involved in information extraction. In this paper, identification of disorder named entities and the mapping of identified disorder entities to SNOMED-CT terminology using UMLS Metathesaurus is presented. A supervised linear chain c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mapping free text to concepts in an ontology has been done by Gobbels et al [29] who used a Naïve Bayes machine learning system to match phrases from clinical records to SNOMED ontology terms, whereas Kate [30] used learned edit distance patterns to normalize clinical text to UMLS IDs. Other approaches have used tools such as MetaMap [31] or cTAKES [13], to extract and map terms to concepts in the UMLS [32,33]. The tools are generally effective for clinical text, but are not portable: they miss relevant information when applied to colloquial language as the one used in social media [34].…”
Section: Concept Extraction and Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping free text to concepts in an ontology has been done by Gobbels et al [29] who used a Naïve Bayes machine learning system to match phrases from clinical records to SNOMED ontology terms, whereas Kate [30] used learned edit distance patterns to normalize clinical text to UMLS IDs. Other approaches have used tools such as MetaMap [31] or cTAKES [13], to extract and map terms to concepts in the UMLS [32,33]. The tools are generally effective for clinical text, but are not portable: they miss relevant information when applied to colloquial language as the one used in social media [34].…”
Section: Concept Extraction and Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, all extracted relevant mentions from the dictionary used in our previous work [2] were merged. For the machine learning-based approach, the training dataset annotated with the occurrence of mention concepts was selected as the training set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is the rule-based FRSSystem capable of extracting Framingham risk factors used for predicting the risk of CAD [ 15 ]. Jonnagaddala et al developed a machine learning-based IE system to identify disease disorder mentions [ 8 ]. The mentioned IE systems can be reused to identify heart disease risk factors but often require customization or addition of new modules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%