2010
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00344.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TNFR1-deficient mice display altered blood pressure and renal responses to ANG II infusion

Abstract: The hypothesis that TNF receptor 1-deficient (TNFR1(-/-)) mice display blood pressure (BP) and renal functional responses that differ from wild-type (WT) mice was tested in an angiotensin II (ANG II)-dependent model of hypertension. Basal systolic BP (SBP), mean arterial pressure, diastolic BP, heart rate (HR), and pulse pressure were similar in WT and TNFR1(-/-) mice. Infusion of ANG II for 7 days elevated SBP to a greater extent in TNFR1(-/-) compared with WT mice; pulse pressure was also elevated in TNFR1(-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
37
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al (7) reported that basal MAP in conscious TNF␣R1 KO mice was not significantly different from that in WT mice. However, the results of the present study, which was conducted in anesthetized mice, demonstrate that basal MAP was lower in TNF␣R1 KO than WT mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al (7) reported that basal MAP in conscious TNF␣R1 KO mice was not significantly different from that in WT mice. However, the results of the present study, which was conducted in anesthetized mice, demonstrate that basal MAP was lower in TNF␣R1 KO than WT mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This form of human recombinant TNF-␣ was widely used in other earlier in vivo studies (7,29,32,33) conducted in mice. The specificity of human TNF-␣ action in the mice was demonstrated in our earlier study (32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in stark contrast to those shown in TNF-␣ KO mice (131) where the increase in blood pressure induced by infusion of 1 g·kg Ϫ1 ·min Ϫ1 ANG II was blunted compared with WT mice and to those shown by Guzik et al (51) where etanercept reduced the increase in blood pressure induced by infusion of ANG II at a rate of 490 ng·kg Ϫ1 ·min Ϫ . While the explanation is not clear, it could be due to the different doses of ANG II used (and hence possibly different mechanisms leading to hypertension), due to the background of the mice (C57Bc/6J vs. B6129SF2/J), or because infusion of ANG II in TNFR1 KO mice increases both TNF-␣ and TNFR2 (24). This later point raises the possibility that the observed phenotype is the result of hyperactive TNFR2 as opposed to a lack of TNFR1 and TNFR2 has been shown to mediate renal macrophage infiltration, glomerulosclerosis, and interstitial fibrosis in ANG II-induced hypertension (129).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies using TNFR1‐KO mice described an even greater hypertensive response to Ang‐II infusion than WT mice (Chen et al. 2010), or no difference between TNFR1‐KO and WT mice (Singh et al. 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%