“…Comamonas (2.44%) and Pseudomonas (1.72%) were relatively enriched in the bBC compared to those in the gBC despite of they dominated in the initial inoculum (Table 2) The potential function of these dominant genera mentioned above was revealed as followed. Firstly, most of the dominant genera (Escherichia, Pseudomonas, Mycobacterium, Flavobacterium, Raoultella, Enterobacter and Desulfovibrio) were capable of reducing nitroaromatics to corresponding aromatic amines or mineralization of nitroraomatics (Comamonas, Pseudomonas and Alcaligenes) (Claus et al, 2006;Ma et al, 2007;Marvin-Sikkema and de Bont, 1994;Spain, 1995) regardless of the performance mode. Subsequently, most of the dominant genera (Pseudomonas, Escherichia, Rhodopseudomonas, Ochrobactrum, Desulfovibrio, Enterobacter, Comamonas and Corynebacterium) were identified with electrochemically activity (Logan, 2009;Rosenbaum et al, 2011;Xing et al, 2010) or dominated in the biocathode (Enterococcus, Pseudomonas and Paracoccus) (Virdis et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011) regardless of some of them dominated in the initial inoculum.…”