2017
DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To accept or not to accept a job offer: Examining inaction inertia in an organizational context

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to investigate inaction inertia in a job offer context. Across two studies, we examined the influence of two situational factors (Study 1) and one dispositional factor (Study 2) on inaction inertia in a job offer context. Participants were asked to imagine they had to pass up an initial offer in which they were interested, but that they received a similar but less attractive offer (lower salary) later. Study 1 findings revealed participants in the loss-framed condition were mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A growing number of factors that influence inaction inertia have also been identified (e.g. Foster and Diab, 2017;Liu and Chou, 2021;Terris and Tykocinski, 2016;Kumar, 2004Kumar, , 2019Mathmann et al, 2017;Tykocinski and Pittman, 1998;van Putten et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2016). However, existent studies have not examined the relationship between quantity promotional frames and inaction inertia and their mediators.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A growing number of factors that influence inaction inertia have also been identified (e.g. Foster and Diab, 2017;Liu and Chou, 2021;Terris and Tykocinski, 2016;Kumar, 2004Kumar, , 2019Mathmann et al, 2017;Tykocinski and Pittman, 1998;van Putten et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2016). However, existent studies have not examined the relationship between quantity promotional frames and inaction inertia and their mediators.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has found this effect occurs across product categories, formats and decision contexts and in other domains of human behavior (Arkes et al, 2002;Butler and Highhouse, 2000;Foster and Diab, 2017;Krijnen et al, 2020;Kumar, 2004;Liu and Chou, 2018, 2019a, b, 2021Terris and Tykocinski, 2016;Terris et al, 2020;Tykocinski and Pittman, 1998;van Putten et al, 2007;Zeelenberg and van Putten, 2005). Studies have also examined how individual characteristics, such as personality and motivation, affect the inaction inertia effect (Mathmann et al, 2017;Otto et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Candidates that meet the specific requirements set by HR managers have high possibility to be offered a job. Despite the fact that most literature focuses on the organizational perspective in offering a job, other studies have also examined the responses of potential candidate in accepting a job offer and the effect of timing that would change their decision (Becker et al, 2010;Foster & Diab, 2017). It all depends on the candidates' agreement on the terms and conditions in the job offer.…”
Section: Job Offer Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It all depends on the candidates' agreement on the terms and conditions in the job offer. Going through the process by which they were assessed would somehow affect their decision to accept or decline any job offer (Foster & Diab, 2017). On the context of the organization itself, several key elements were reviewed and examined which eventually comes to the final decision whether to offer or not the specified job vacancy (Chun-Hsi et al, 2008).…”
Section: Job Offer Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inaction inertia effect has been used to explain many other phenomena such as product change aversion (Tykocinski & Pittman, 2001), procrastination (Pittman et al, 2007), suboptimal decisions regarding retirement savings (Krijnen et al, 2019), job offer negotiation (Foster & Diab, 2017), and international affairs (Terris & Tykocinski, 2016). As an example from education, students who missed an initial opportunity to submit an assignment early for a big bonus were more likely to end up never submitting that assignment at all (e.g., Pittman et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%