2024
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1325047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To analyze the relationship between gut microbiota, metabolites and migraine: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Kang Qu,
Ming-Xi Li,
Lin Gan
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundIt has been suggested in several observational studies that migraines are associated with the gut microbiota. It remains unclear, however, how the gut microbiota and migraines are causally related.MethodsWe performed a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics for the gut microbiota were obtained from the MiBioGen consortium (n = 18,340) and the Dutch Microbiota Project (n = 7,738). Pooled GWAS data for plasma metabolites were obta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Central focus of this study was the results of the IVW method, which showed the strongest ability to test for causal relationships in MR analyses ( 26 ). In the event that the IVW method yielded a p-value of less than 0.05, the result was incorporated into the subsequent study ( 27 ). Subsequently, BWMR was employed to reinforce the IVW method, with the outcome deemed significant when both methods yielded p-values below 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central focus of this study was the results of the IVW method, which showed the strongest ability to test for causal relationships in MR analyses ( 26 ). In the event that the IVW method yielded a p-value of less than 0.05, the result was incorporated into the subsequent study ( 27 ). Subsequently, BWMR was employed to reinforce the IVW method, with the outcome deemed significant when both methods yielded p-values below 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the strength of IVs, we used the F-statistics, which were calculated using the following equation: F = R 2 (n-k-1)/k(1-R 2 ), where R 2 represented the proportion of variance in the exposure explained by the instrument, n was the sample size, and k represented the number of SNPs. A value of F > 10 indicated that there was no significant weak instrumental bias ( Qu et al, 2024 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%