To be or not to be? Public archaeology as a tool of public opinion and the dilemma of intellectuality

Abstract

Stating the value of archaeology for contemporary society is a very difficult task hardly undertaken by archaeologists. Work with a contemporary record directly linked to local communities, and the approach of public archaeology, have helped to bring society and archaeology closer together. However, the role of a public intellectual goes beyond archaeology, delving into current social worries. Is it possible to play this game from archaeology? The multiple and complex relations between archaeology and society open the door to participation in public debates, but we stand to lose our essence. We face a Shakespearean dilemma, a choice between having an influential voice in the present, or just an expert opinion.

An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites

“…However, using SNS for archeological communication was found to have limited uptake, due to broader factors such as corporate communication policies, digital literacy, costs, ICT infrastructure, ethical issues, regional traditions, and individual attitudes (Beale & Ogden, 2012; Colley, 2014; Laracuente, 2012). Other studies also emphasized that the participation in public conversations through SNS invites reconsidering questions of archeological information authority and reliability (Larsson, 2013; Richardson, 2012, 2014; Sánchez, 2013; Walker, 2014b). As noted, archeological organizations rarely support plural, participatory approaches to archeological heritage, or acknowledge a shared authority , thus indicating a gap between professionally produced archeological data and non-professional or community participation (Morgan & Pallascio, 2015; Richardson, 2014).…”