‘To be understood as to understand’: A readability analysis of public library acceptable use policies

Abstract

Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs) are documents stating the limitations users must agree to when first accessing information and communications technologies (ICTs) in organisations, such as employers, educational institutions and public libraries. AUPs lay out the parameters of acceptable use expected of someone accessing the ICT services provided, and should state in clear and understandable terms what behaviours will attract sanctions, both legal and in terms of restricting future access. Utilising a range of standard readability tests used to measure how understandable documents are, the paper investigates how readable the AUPs presented to public library patrons in the UK are in practice. Of the 206 AUPs in use across the local government departments who manage public library services 200 were obtained and subjected to a range of readability testing procedures. Four readability tests were used for analysis: the Flesch Reading Ease, the Coleman-Liau Index, the Gunning Fog Index and the SMOG Grade. Results for all four readability tests administered on all AUPs raise significant questions. For the Flesch Reading Ease score only 5.5% of AUPs scored at the standard readability level or higher (60+), and 8% scored at a very high level of difficulty akin to a piece of scientific writing. Similarly, for SMOG, only 7.5% of the 200 AUPs scored at the recommended level of 10. Likewise, very few AUPs scored at levels recommended for a general audience with either the Gunning Fog Index (11.5%) or the Coleman-Liau Index (2%). With such variability in readability, the fitness for purpose of the average AUP as a contract patrons must agree to can be called into question. This paper presents the first ever analysis of the readability of library AUPs in the literature. Recommendations are made as to how public library services may improve this aspect of practice.

Increasing or decreasing reading trend: an overview of the current status of the public libraries in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

“…Later, the advent of technology quickly changed the world with many databases to support research in various fields with database resources and publish e-books. Despite the ubiquity of mobile smartphones and technological advances, public libraries are still important, and technology even makes it easier to access documents that are easy to read and understand (Robinson and McMenemy, 2019). In 2002, the Pakistan higher education commission laid the foundation for the digital library project to improve academic research in higher education.…”

The pragmatics of weeding

“…Those policy statements intended to protect the library from legal action or government intervention (e.g. Edlund, 2020; Lazakis, 2020; Robinson and McMenemy, 2020) are more likely to be posted on library websites (Lipinski et al , 2016).…”

Communicating Patron Rights and Responsibilities Transparently: Creating a Model Internet Acceptable Use Policy for UK Public Libraries

“…It is also an important venue for fostering digital citizenship which requires "regular and effective Internet access and the skills to use the technology" (Mossberger, Tolbert, andHamilton 2012, 2493). The AUP is an important part of managing this access, and the AUP document can be used to inform the patron of good Internet use, as well as imparting the principles of digital citizenship (Robinson and McMenemy 2019). In many ways, the library AUP provides a 'gateway' to digital services and information, and should not be underestimated as it plays a pivotal role in strategies and practices designed to bridge the digital divide.…”