To behave or not to behave ethically: A question of style?

Berisha, Gentrit; Oliveira, Luciana; Humolli, Edon

doi:10.1111/basr.12298

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 156 publications

(183 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our paper purports an important policy implication for entrepreneurship education. As we evidence in our study in a transition and emerging economy, education does not influence the ethical behavior of individuals, which has been evidenced in other studies focused on non-western contexts (Béchard & Grégoire, 2005;Berisha, Oliveira, & Humolli, 2023). We contemplate that entrepreneurship education should not be reduced to business venturing but should integrate ethical reasoning and behavior (Heinrichs, Minnameier, & Beck, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 66%

Untitled

2024

JEMI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

is an interdisciplinary, double-blind peer-reviewed journal, emphasizing theoretical and empirical articles on entrepreneurship, management, and innovation. The journal is published in ELECTRONIC (online first) and PRINT (occasionally) formats. See our website: http://www.jemi.edu.pl.JEMI is an interdisciplinary, focused on economics, business, and management journal that uniquely combines three thematic areas: i) entrepreneurship, including entrepreneurial process, entrepreneurial finance, and SME and entrepreneurship policy; ii) all types of management; iii) innovation, comprising innovation economics, policy, and management. In this vein, the JEMI contributes to economics, business, and management research, as well as business practice and policy in the closely related areas of new venture creation and growth, knowledge generation, retention, appropriation, transfer, and governance, as well as innovation processes and their economic impacts. In a nutshell, our journal addresses the interrelated research fields of entrepreneurial venturing and growth, management, and innovation economics and management. We also acknowledge the context of business venturing, knowledge and innovation, by linking these areas with such background topics as social context of entrepreneurship, environmental and energy issues, human resource migration, or entrepreneurial finance. THE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AREA OF THE JOURNALThe entrepreneurship area of the journal covers the three major topics: 1) venture creation and small business, 2) the impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth including local and regional development, and 3) entrepreneurial attitudes and motives. We invite original papers of theoretical and empirical nature, rooted in the disciplines of economics, management, sociology, political science, and psychology. The interdisciplinary research is encouraged to assure a comprehensive approach to the topics discussed and to advance both theory and practice. THE MANAGEMENT AREA OF THE JOURNALWe welcome articles interpreting contemporary management problems, new methods and management tools, new forms of organization and management, new threats in management, or new challenges in the organization's environment. Management, as a thematic scope of the journal, focuses on theoretical and empirical considerations of various areas (but not limited to): such as strategic management, business process management, operation or production management, human resource management, information management, and network management. THE INNOVATION AREA OF THE JOURNALThe innovation area of the Journal's focus emphasizes a broad range of topics and approaches, including (but not limited to): comparative analyses of national and regional policy or sector issues, such as R&D trends, patents, citations, etc., empirical studies on within-organization innovation management, viewed from various perspectives (organizational behavior, psychology of creativity, organizational structures, styles of leadership and team-building strategies, promoting creativi...

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 66%

Untitled

2024

JEMI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Behaving with style: investigating the influence of decision-making styles on the innovative work behavior of managers

Ibrahimi,

Berisha,

Krasniqi

et al. 2024

JOEPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper explores the relationship between managers’ decision-making style (DMS) and innovative work behavior (IWB). Our study addresses a notable gap in existing research, as the relationship between DMS and IWB has been unexplored.Design/methodology/approachWe rely on data from a sample of managers from diverse companies in Kosovo to test our hypotheses. We use structural equation modeling for data analysis, and as a complementary test, we perform a necessary condition analysis.FindingsManagers who adopt rational and intuitive decision-making styles tend to demonstrate higher IWB, whereas those who favor dependent, avoiding or spontaneous decision-making styles behave less innovatively. Rational style is a necessary but not sufficient condition for IWB of managers.Practical implicationsThe innovative work behavior of managers is significantly influenced by their decision-making style. Based on this relationship, our research can contribute to decision-making training, personnel selection and development, career planning and organizational innovation initiatives.Originality/valueOur study is the first to investigate the relationship between decision-making styles and innovative work behavior with a sample of managers. Furthermore, it is the first study to investigate the stylistic determinants of the innovative work behavior of managers in a non-Western context.

show abstract

Conductas deshonestas: ¿se juzga a los otros como a uno mismo?

Berumen,

Rabadán-Pérez,

Arriaza-Ibarra

2024

Estud. Sociol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Con el objetivo de evaluar el juicio ético de los universitarios respecto a la comisión de acciones deshonestas, se construyó una base de datos a partir de las respuestas de 659 estudiantes de universidad en Madrid. Se preguntó sobre la intensidad de la acción deshonesta, su gravedad y cuán reprochable es si la realiza un tercero. Las metodologías utilizadas son el análisis clúster de K-medias, el análisis discriminante lineal y de correlaciones sobre proporciones. Los resultados señalan que, metodológicamente, es posible clasificar a los individuos según distintos perfiles según la gravedad del juicio y la tendencia a cometer acciones deshonestas, y que cuanto más deshonestos son, más comprensivos se muestran con la deshonestidad de terceros.

show abstract

To behave or not to behave ethically: A question of style?

Cited by 3 publications

References 156 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Behaving with style: investigating the influence of decision-making styles on the innovative work behavior of managers

Conductas deshonestas: ¿se juzga a los otros como a uno mismo?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About