“…In addition to the substantial risks brought by the high dependence on land finance, such as pushing up housing prices, aggravating urban-rural conflicts, and threatening the protection of arable land (Cao et al, 2008;Cao, Lv, Zheng, and Wang, 2014;Timberlake, Wei, Ma, & Hao, 2014;Wang, Chen, et al, 2012;Wang, Thill, et al, 2012;Wu et al, 2015;Yang & Pang, 2011;Yu, Wu, Zheng, Zhang, & Shen, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014), the social inequality pertaining to public accessibility to urban green spaces, an emergent problem in Chinese cities (Wolch, Byrne, & Newell, 2014), might be exacerbated. While homeowners inside well-greened residential compounds can enjoy adequate accessibility to their privileged green spaces in their gated precincts (Fleischer, 2007;Wu, 2004), sometimes over-generously provided by real estate developers, outsiders (those lower-income earners who cannot afford new commercial housing) (Breitung, 2012) might be facing a deprivation of public green spaces during the process that potential or even existent public green land is leased out to maximize municipal land revenues. A recent study suggested that many residents in Shanghai lack access to parks (Yin & Xu, 2009).…”