To Compare the Effect of Different Shade Materials on the Physiological and Biochemical Variables in Buffalo Calves in Summer Season

The Challenge of Global Warming in Water Buffalo Farming: Physiological and Behavioral Aspects and Strategies to Face Heat Stress

“…Based on the relationship between the RR and the level of discomfort, these results suggest that TPS is the most efficient material to provide a favorable micro-environment. These findings by Barman et al [85] are summarized in Figure 6.…”

“…Based on the relationship between the RR and the level of discomfort, these results suggest that TPS is the most efficient material to provide a favorable micro-environment. These findings by Barman et al [85] are summarized in Figure 6. Additionally, apart from considering the thermal benefits that the facility design must provide to animals, as shown in Barman et al's [85] study, it is necessary to highlight the possible influence of these materials on animal health.…”

“…These findings by Barman et al [85] are summarized in Figure 6. Additionally, apart from considering the thermal benefits that the facility design must provide to animals, as shown in Barman et al's [85] study, it is necessary to highlight the possible influence of these materials on animal health. For example, an asbestos roof shed is considered a traditional roof type.…”

“…Nonetheless, studies show significant differences between shade materials. Barman et al [85], compared the RR and RT values of 24 buffalo calves housed in different roofs: an asbestos roof (AR); pre-painted CGI sheet roof (PSR); thatch with polythene shading roof (TPS); and galvanized iron sheet roof (GIS). The results indicated that the animals under the TPS roof had a lower RT, while the animals under the GIS and AR had significant increases in the RT.…”