2020
DOI: 10.1002/jee.20313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To cross the picket line or join it: Facing engineering education's role in the socioeconomic exploitation of marginalized peoples to further a discipline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration of social justice viewpoints may have the additional benefit of engaging engineers in problem-solving for problems faced by traditionally oppressed and marginalized communities. Similarly, engineering education can actively stand for a broader set of social justice issues to assist in positioning engineering to answer problems for all people, such as in the recent editorial by Justin Major reflecting on worker's rights and conferences [43].…”
Section: Solutions For Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of social justice viewpoints may have the additional benefit of engaging engineers in problem-solving for problems faced by traditionally oppressed and marginalized communities. Similarly, engineering education can actively stand for a broader set of social justice issues to assist in positioning engineering to answer problems for all people, such as in the recent editorial by Justin Major reflecting on worker's rights and conferences [43].…”
Section: Solutions For Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is also entrenched in the history, culture, and practices of engineering education that are raced, classed, and gendered. A significant body of work has emphasized how structural and cultural norms replicate Whiteness and masculinity in engineering, and this work emphasizes the need to dismantle structures that perpetuate inequity within engineering education [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Other work has examined how these norms are linked to particular ways of being, thinking, and knowing that continuously limit who can do engineering [9], who belongs in engineering [10], and what counts as engineering [11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%