2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To die or not to die: how does p53 decide?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
180
1
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
3
180
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…12 TP53 may also repress transcription of BCL2. 12 However, there was no change in BCL2 gene or protein expression of Reh cells after IR, indicating that this mechanism was not involved. Another candidate that might have contributed to the apoptotic phenotype of Reh cells is ID3, which was upregulated in Reh cells at 4 hr after radiation and downregulated in U698.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 TP53 may also repress transcription of BCL2. 12 However, there was no change in BCL2 gene or protein expression of Reh cells after IR, indicating that this mechanism was not involved. Another candidate that might have contributed to the apoptotic phenotype of Reh cells is ID3, which was upregulated in Reh cells at 4 hr after radiation and downregulated in U698.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Induction of apoptosis has also been reported to depend on TP53 but can be induced through a number of other pathways as well. 12 Although differences in TP53 functionality have been suggested to be responsible for differences in IR-induced apoptosis and cell cycle delays among lymphoma lines, 7-9 the exact role of TP53 for the radiation response is not clear. 5,13 Tumor cells often have defects in the signal transduction for cell cycle control, DNA repair and induction of cell death that can be caused by mutations and/or amplifications/deletions of genes other than TP53.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inactivation of the p53 protein is the most common strategy developed by tumour cells to evade apoptosis. p53 is central in the DNA damage response and triggers cell death by both transcription-dependent and -independent mechanisms (Slee et al, 2004;Yee and Vousden, 2005). Other examples of apoptosis evasion include disruption of Fas death receptor pathway, upregulation of the widespread antiapoptotic family of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) or downregulation of caspases (Muschen et al, 2000;Teitz et al, 2000;Yang et al, 2003).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Apoptosis and Its Subversion In Oncogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p53 tumor suppressor gene plays a complex and critical role in maintaining genome integrity (Levine, 1997;Vogelstein et al, 2000;Soussi, 2000;Slee et al, 2004). Loss of p53 function increases susceptibility to malignant transformation, and mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene are the most common genetic abnormalities in oncology, found in >50% of all human cancers (Lutzker and Levine, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%