2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To diversify or not to diversify, that is the question. Pursuing agricultural development for smallholder farmers in marginal areas of Ghana

Abstract: HighlightsSmallholders in northern Ghana maintain high levels of de facto crop diversity.Most species are used for both self-consumption and market sales.The value of species used for self-consumption was on average 55% higher than that of crop sales.Crop diversity is positively associated with self-consumption of food crops, and cash income from crops sold.Crop diversification seems more beneficial to the farmers in northern Ghana than specialization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
94
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
94
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the surge in empirical analyses linking agricultural production (diversity) and dietary diversity (e.g., Sibhatu and Qaim, 2018;Bellon et al, 2020) there is still a distinct lack of tools that can be used to perform (CSA) assessment using all of this information. A new review by Nicholson et al (under review) analyzed agricultural production models in a repeat of earlier work (e.g., van Wijk et al, 2014;Stephens et al, 2018) and noted the lack of integration of food security and nutritional knowledge into agricultural assessment tools.…”
Section: Pillar 1: Food Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the surge in empirical analyses linking agricultural production (diversity) and dietary diversity (e.g., Sibhatu and Qaim, 2018;Bellon et al, 2020) there is still a distinct lack of tools that can be used to perform (CSA) assessment using all of this information. A new review by Nicholson et al (under review) analyzed agricultural production models in a repeat of earlier work (e.g., van Wijk et al, 2014;Stephens et al, 2018) and noted the lack of integration of food security and nutritional knowledge into agricultural assessment tools.…”
Section: Pillar 1: Food Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agroecological transitions should equally enhance socio-economic resilience. Through diversification and integration, producers reduce their vulnerability should a single crop, livestock species or other commodity fail (Dumont et al 2013;Bellon et al 2020;Bowles et al 2020). By reducing dependence on external inputs through enhanced reliance on biological processes underpinning soil health and the regulation of pests and diseases (Tscharntke et al 2005;Barrios et al 2012b;Dumont et al 2013), agroecology can reduce producers' vulnerability to economic risk (Schipanski et al 2016;Feliciano 2019).…”
Section: Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic principle is to remove the conditions that favor the growth and reproduction of pests [3] . Crop rotation can also break the life cycle of weeds, pests and pathogens with limited mobility and narrow host ranges [23] . Crop diversification has always been regarded as an environmentally-friendly model.…”
Section: Field Scalementioning
confidence: 99%