2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-013-0196-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To Err is Human(-like): Effects of Robot Gesture on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Likability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
195
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
14
195
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It was further found that the nature of the request (revocable versus irrevocable) influenced the participants' decisions on compliance. Interestingly, the results in this study also show that participants attributed less anthropomorphism when the robot made errors, which contradict those found by an earlier study the same authors had performed [110].…”
Section: Social-based Interactions: Robots Influencing Humanscontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was further found that the nature of the request (revocable versus irrevocable) influenced the participants' decisions on compliance. Interestingly, the results in this study also show that participants attributed less anthropomorphism when the robot made errors, which contradict those found by an earlier study the same authors had performed [110].…”
Section: Social-based Interactions: Robots Influencing Humanscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…While this tendency to anthropomorphize can be helpful in some cases, it poses a serious risk if this naturally gives humans a higher degree of trust in robots than is warranted. The question of how a robot's performance influences anthropomorphization is also unclear-with recent studies finding conflicting results [110,111].…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By anthropomorphizing natural phenomenon, we simplifying the world around us to make sense of our environment by projecting a host of expectations about human life onto aspects of that environment (Persson et al, 2000). Earlier finding have shown that people are not only anthropomorphizing humanlike robots (e.g., Kuchenbrandt et al, 2011;Salem et al, 2011), but also non-humanoid robots (e.g., Friedman, Kahn, & Hagman, 2003;Kerepesi et al, 2006) and other kinds of autonomously moving objects and phenomenon such as computers (e.g., Nass & Moon, 2000), religious figures such as god (e.g., Barrett & Keil, 1996), and geometric shapes (e.g., Heider & Simmel, 1944).…”
Section: Humanoid Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communicative functionality is, however, largely dependent on the appearance of-and attributions to-the robot (Salem, Eyssel, Rohlfing, Kopp, & Joublin, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropomorphism is a mechanism through which social interactions with robots and humans can be facilitated (Duffy, 2003), and the effect of anthropomorphism is increased when a robot portrays nonverbal communication (Salem, Eyssel, Rohlfing, Kopp, & Joublin, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%