2016
DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20164470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of alvarado score, C-reactive protein, ultrasonography and computed tomography in acute appendicitis and to correlate them with operative and histological findings

Abstract: Background:Despite extraordinary advances in modern radiology and laboratory investigations an accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis cannot be made in atypical cases. No single diagnostic aid can dramatically reduce the rate of negative appendicectomy.Methods: To reduce the rate of negative appendicectomies by the combined use of diagnostic modalities in a prospective study from July 2011 to December 2012 was done. 100 patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies, such as Pipal et al . 22 , show that the addition of imaging modalities to the clinical scoring system increases the diagnostic accuracy of the test and Kurane et al . 20 which was also shown by our combined score test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies, such as Pipal et al . 22 , show that the addition of imaging modalities to the clinical scoring system increases the diagnostic accuracy of the test and Kurane et al . 20 which was also shown by our combined score test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Alvarado score was chosen because it includes the patient's symptoms, findings and laboratory evaluation and has reported accuracy rates between 78% and 82% for acute appendicitis. 9 According to this scoring system, surgery is recommended in patients that have 7 or more points; patients with fewer than 7 points should be monitored. 10 As well as descriptive statistical methods…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%