2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13389-020-00224-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To infect or not to infect: a critical analysis of infective countermeasures in fault attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We revisit a duplication based fault countermeasure in Chapter 9; which is available in [BSS20] and [BSS19], with minor change. The contributions here are manifold.…”
Section: Research Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We revisit a duplication based fault countermeasure in Chapter 9; which is available in [BSS20] and [BSS19], with minor change. The contributions here are manifold.…”
Section: Research Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in [BSS20]/Chapter 9 that the countermeasure proposed in [TBM14] does not follow the infection paradigm, as it suffers from the one-bit judgment condition similar to detection. A similar claim is made in [FCL + 20, Section VIII.A].…”
Section: Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also mention that, sophisticated duplication countermeasure, may require additional components as well as an external source of randomness [BSS20]. Besides, we would like to point out that for CRAFT the protection against DFA is much restricted.…”
Section: Dfa Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our detailed analysis reveals that while triplication can protect against SIFA, a sophisticated version of duplication can also do the same. The idea of our protection stems from the existing duplication based DFA countermeasures[BSS20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%