Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Henry Ford once said, “For most purposes, a man with a machine is better than a man without a machine.” To this, engineers today propose an addendum – “and a man thatisa machine is best of all” – which they have made their goal. The world over, engineers are working to make the ultimate machine, “the holy grail of artificial intelligence,” aconscioushumanoid. On the one hand, such a “machine” will be capable of relieving us of all our burdens. On the other hand, in so doing, will we not have “birthed,” as it were, a new class of slaves? In this essay I seek to summarize the various arguments made in this debate, bring to bear moral positions from the philosophy of technology, philosophy of law and philosophy of religion, as well as demonstrate the moral impropriety of such an endeavor from each of the classic moral approaches (i.e., Virtue Ethics, Consequentialism, Kantian Deontology). Finally, given that the debate centers around what is the “good life” for human or humanoid, I expand upon Aristotle’s Eudemonia and Maimonides’Summum Bonumto argue that life is precious in its affordance to allow conscious beings, human or humanoid, to aspire to the best life possible.
Henry Ford once said, “For most purposes, a man with a machine is better than a man without a machine.” To this, engineers today propose an addendum – “and a man thatisa machine is best of all” – which they have made their goal. The world over, engineers are working to make the ultimate machine, “the holy grail of artificial intelligence,” aconscioushumanoid. On the one hand, such a “machine” will be capable of relieving us of all our burdens. On the other hand, in so doing, will we not have “birthed,” as it were, a new class of slaves? In this essay I seek to summarize the various arguments made in this debate, bring to bear moral positions from the philosophy of technology, philosophy of law and philosophy of religion, as well as demonstrate the moral impropriety of such an endeavor from each of the classic moral approaches (i.e., Virtue Ethics, Consequentialism, Kantian Deontology). Finally, given that the debate centers around what is the “good life” for human or humanoid, I expand upon Aristotle’s Eudemonia and Maimonides’Summum Bonumto argue that life is precious in its affordance to allow conscious beings, human or humanoid, to aspire to the best life possible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.