2011
DOI: 10.1075/sl.35.2.02eri
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘To not be’ or not ‘to not be’

Abstract: In a substantial number of languages negation of non-verbal predicates diverges from standard negation. In this paper I approach this phenomenon from a typological perspective, and claim that non-standard negation of non-verbal predicates can be described through a generalization I refer to as DNA (Direct Negation Avoidance), which means that the non-verbal predicates avoid being in the direct scope of negation. DNA can be subcategorized into various DNA strategies, and in the first half of the paper I list an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is reported to be less common typologically. Therefore, the direct similarity in the use of negation strategy across languages like Hamar clearly supports Eriksen's (2011) claim that the two sentence types should be analysed as subtypes of the same phenomenon. Examples are provided below:…”
Section: ] Interaction Between Negation and Subject Agreement Marking...supporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is reported to be less common typologically. Therefore, the direct similarity in the use of negation strategy across languages like Hamar clearly supports Eriksen's (2011) claim that the two sentence types should be analysed as subtypes of the same phenomenon. Examples are provided below:…”
Section: ] Interaction Between Negation and Subject Agreement Marking...supporting
confidence: 59%
“…The focus of much of the typological literature on negation has been on standard negation, with little attention provided to non-standard negation from cross-linguistic perspectives (Eriksen 2011). In recent years, this seems to have changed slightly with significant contributions from Eriksen (2011) and Veselinova (2013) on the expression of nonverbal and existential sentences respectively.…”
Section: Binyam Sisaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Non-verbal predication constitutes a cross-linguistically salient clause domain which tends to exhibit negative patterns diverging from other clause types (Eriksen 2011;Miestamo 2017). This is also the case for Bantu, where these diverging patterns furthermore may include the use of negative verbs.…”
Section: Negative Verbs In Non-verbal Predicative Clausesmentioning
confidence: 98%