2018
DOI: 10.1108/ijmf-07-2017-0144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To pay or not to pay: what matters the most for dividend payments?

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test the stickiness of payout policy across times for Indian firms, by identifying the determinants of dividend payout (for amount of dividends as well as probability of dividends) and examine their predictive consistency through good and bad times, affiliation categories, amid controls for idiosyncratic characteristics. The authors also examine the scantly explored effects of financial constraints on firms’ dividend decisions. Design/methodology/approach The authors u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
47
0
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
14
47
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, companies with greater AGE have higher propensity to pay dividends, which is 1.3120 times higher than those with smaller AGE. It is in accordance with the result of Ranajee et al [8] which proves that older companies have higher propensity to pay dividends; (4) the estimated value of SIZE variable coefficients toward PPD is 0.3316, the standard error value is 0.1685, the probability is 0.0491, and the odds ratio is 1.3935. Referring to the 0.05 significance level, it can be concluded that there is strong empirical evidence to accept hypothesis 4.1.…”
Section: The Results Of Modelsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, companies with greater AGE have higher propensity to pay dividends, which is 1.3120 times higher than those with smaller AGE. It is in accordance with the result of Ranajee et al [8] which proves that older companies have higher propensity to pay dividends; (4) the estimated value of SIZE variable coefficients toward PPD is 0.3316, the standard error value is 0.1685, the probability is 0.0491, and the odds ratio is 1.3935. Referring to the 0.05 significance level, it can be concluded that there is strong empirical evidence to accept hypothesis 4.1.…”
Section: The Results Of Modelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The support to the life cycle theory is shown by significant positive impacts of company size and profitability on the tendency to pay dividends and significant negative impact of investment opportunities on dividend payments. Third, the study of Ranajee, Pathak, & Saxena [8] on all companies listed on the National Stock Exchange and the Bombay Stock Exchange from April 2001 to March 2016, except for financial, utilities, and government companies, concludes that age and size of company are significant positive factors to determine the dividend rate decisions, which is in line with the life cycle theory.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The older a company, the better the ability to generate higher profits due to better business experience. Older companies tend to set higher dividend rate as they are capable of making greater profits (Badu, 2019;Ranajee et al, 2018). Thus, the following hypothesis was formulated: H10: Company Size has a positive and significant influence on Dividend Policy.…”
Section: Development Of Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have investigated investors to learn their perspectives on dividends (For example, Baker & Jabbouri, 2017;Baker, Kapoor, & Jabbouri, 2018). Several studies even investigated specific company attributes as determinants of dividend policy (For example, Ranajee, Pathak, & Saxena, 2018;Singla & Samanta, 2019;Budagaga, 2020). Other studies tested a model life cycle empirically to understand why companies pay dividends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%