2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03597-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To plate, or not to plate? A systematic review of functional outcomes and complications of plate fixation in patellar fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a biomechanical study conducted by Wagner FC et al [ 31 ], osteosynthesis with an anterior locking plate was compared with cannulated screws with tension band wiring in comminuted patellar fractures. The results indicated that plates provided better primary stability in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a biomechanical study conducted by Wagner FC et al [ 31 ], osteosynthesis with an anterior locking plate was compared with cannulated screws with tension band wiring in comminuted patellar fractures. The results indicated that plates provided better primary stability in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Tsotsolis S. et al [ 31 ] reported a 10.44% complication rate associated with the use of plates for patellar fractures, a lower figure compared to osteosynthesis with cerclage. Cerclage fixation combined with hook plate, according to Gu et al [ 22 ], has been revealed as a reliable method for managing fractures of the lower patellar pole, allowing immediate rehabilitation and weight-bearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings suggest that open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating for patellar fractures is a safe alternative, associated with a lower complication and reoperation rate compared to tension band wiring (TBW). The authors emphasize the need for future randomized prospective studies to validate the results of this systematic review [ 87 ].…”
Section: Comparison Of Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%