2024
DOI: 10.1002/asi.24880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey

Rong Ni,
Ludo Waltman

Abstract: Open science is receiving widespread attention globally, and preprinting offers an important way to implement open science practices in scholarly publishing. To develop a systematic understanding of researchers' adoption of and attitudes toward preprinting, we conducted a survey of authors of research papers published in 2021 and early 2022. Our survey results show that the United States and Europe led the way in the adoption of preprinting. The United States and European respondents reported a higher familiar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Efforts to transition away from subscription publishing models have posed a series of new challenges: as open access models diversify, so too does the complexity of navigating licensing (Baldwin & Pinfield, 2018), embargoes (Koley & Lala, 2022), predatory publishing (Grudniewicz et al, 2019), and supporting authors with the rising costs of Article Processing Charges (Butler et al, 2023) through transformative agreements (Fontúrbel & Vizentin-Bugoni, 2020;Farley et al, 2021). In tandem, the Open Science movement has catalyzed advancements in publishing infrastructures and tools, such as preprint servers (Ni & Waltman, 2024). Open peer review initiatives such as Peer Community In (PCI) and MetaROR have emerged, aiming to facilitate the open communication and evaluation of research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to transition away from subscription publishing models have posed a series of new challenges: as open access models diversify, so too does the complexity of navigating licensing (Baldwin & Pinfield, 2018), embargoes (Koley & Lala, 2022), predatory publishing (Grudniewicz et al, 2019), and supporting authors with the rising costs of Article Processing Charges (Butler et al, 2023) through transformative agreements (Fontúrbel & Vizentin-Bugoni, 2020;Farley et al, 2021). In tandem, the Open Science movement has catalyzed advancements in publishing infrastructures and tools, such as preprint servers (Ni & Waltman, 2024). Open peer review initiatives such as Peer Community In (PCI) and MetaROR have emerged, aiming to facilitate the open communication and evaluation of research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%