2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j1195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To prohibit or regulate psychoactive substances: has New Zealand got the right approach?

Abstract: Prohibition of a continuous stream of new psychoactive substances is both difficult and costly Shakila Rizwan and Andrea Vernall look at New Zealand’s attempt to regulate instead

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 5F-Cumyl-PINACA was among these compounds and sold as SGT-25 [ 16 ]. Since the amendment of the act in May 2014, no new psychoactive substance was approved for sale [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5F-Cumyl-PINACA was among these compounds and sold as SGT-25 [ 16 ]. Since the amendment of the act in May 2014, no new psychoactive substance was approved for sale [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Act made it illegal to sell a psychoactive substance that may be used for human consumption and most of the head shops closed within months of the Act coming into force. The NZ Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 took a different approach and set up a legal framework for the testing, manufacture, sale and regulation of psychoactive products. Selected NPS were intended to be sold through licensed outlets after undergoing rigorous clinical testing to ensure they were safe for human consumption before sale was permitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 2000s, there has been a similar increase in the rate of identification of NPS on the New Zealand market, with the emergence of the unregulated legal “party pills.” The active components of the pills were piperazines, mainly benzylpiperazine (BZP) and trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP). As the use of these pills became popular, concerns were raised about their potential detrimental effect to the health of the user . In 2008, the New Zealand government, on the advice of the Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs, classified BZP, TFMPP, and other piperazines under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the use of these pills became popular, concerns were raised about their potential detrimental effect to the health of the user. 6 In 2008, the New Zealand government, on the advice of the Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs, classified BZP, TFMPP, and other piperazines under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975. 7 This pattern continued, with many emerging new substances eventually being incorporated into drugs legislation, either through specific listing, controlled drug analog (CDA) provisions, or Temporary Class Drug Notices (TCDNs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%