2004
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1030.0028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?

Abstract: The terms pull and lean production have become cornerstones of modern manufacturing practice. However, although they are widely used, they are less widely understood. In this paper, we argue that while the academic literature has steadily revealed the richness of the pull/lean concepts, the practitioner literature has progressively simplified these terms to the point that serious misunderstandings now exist. In hopes of reducing confusion, we offer general, but precise definitions of pull and lean. Specificall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
322
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 455 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
322
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…An important aspect within BPM is the distribution of information between employees in processes with divided responsibilities [2]. During the last decade, research in information logistics has been addressing the aspect of optimized information supply (see Section 3).…”
Section: Relevance Of Individual Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important aspect within BPM is the distribution of information between employees in processes with divided responsibilities [2]. During the last decade, research in information logistics has been addressing the aspect of optimized information supply (see Section 3).…”
Section: Relevance Of Individual Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research approach taken is an exploratory investigation with argumentative, deductive elements. The main contribution of the work is (1) to show the relevance of integrating IP and ILOG, (2) to identify which changes would be required in IDPs for implementing this integration and (3) to illustrate the integration based on an illustrative example.…”
Section: Relevance Of Individual Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third subdivision of waste was suggested by Narasimhan et al (2006 pp 441-442) who stated that: "Recent studies (Hopp and Spearman, 2004;de Treville and Antonakis, 2006) Since waste is a source of excess buffering, we at least gain an understanding as to what waste is not. Buffers were defined by Hopp & Spearman (2004) in terms of excess inventory (safety stocks), excess capacity and safety lead time.…”
Section: The Concept Of Obvious and Less Obvious Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While excess capacity can be used to buffer the shop against fluctuations in demand, the latter two forms of waste are lost capacity. On the contrary, Hopp & Spearman (2004) viewed excess inventory and capacity as being excess buffering -where buffering is not the same as waste since waste was defined by the authors as the source of excess buffering. Meanwhile, Narasimhan et al (2006) differentiated between 'obvious' wastes, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practice points us toward the problems of greatest concern and invites us to honestly address these pressing problems, but another important role of research is to properly place new ideas in perspective, exposing the connections with all that has been done before. Hopp (2012) eloquently makes the case for practice as a source for problems, but in Hopp and Spearman (2004), he also demonstrates the importance of careful scholarship. Cachon (2012) has done remarkably well in directly answering the question: What is interesting research in operations management?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%