2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To reduce or abstain? Substance use goals in the treatment of veterans with substance use disorders and comorbid PTSD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many persons with comorbid SUD/PTSD may be reluctant to pursue abstinence or may otherwise experience increased difficulty reducing substance use, particularly if substances are used to self‐medicate PTSD symptoms 22 . Examination of substance use goal choice in the context of an integrated treatment for SUD and co‐occurring PTSD yielded findings consistent with those on goal choice in the SUD literature 23 . Specifically, among treatment‐seeking veterans with SUD/PTSD, approximately half endorsed a treatment goal other than abstinence (eg, reduced use) and these individuals were significantly younger, more likely to be employed, and endorsed significantly fewer symptoms of alcohol dependence, compared to those with an abstinence goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many persons with comorbid SUD/PTSD may be reluctant to pursue abstinence or may otherwise experience increased difficulty reducing substance use, particularly if substances are used to self‐medicate PTSD symptoms 22 . Examination of substance use goal choice in the context of an integrated treatment for SUD and co‐occurring PTSD yielded findings consistent with those on goal choice in the SUD literature 23 . Specifically, among treatment‐seeking veterans with SUD/PTSD, approximately half endorsed a treatment goal other than abstinence (eg, reduced use) and these individuals were significantly younger, more likely to be employed, and endorsed significantly fewer symptoms of alcohol dependence, compared to those with an abstinence goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Exclusion criteria included: (a) current psychotic disorder or other condition that may require a higher level of care; (b) current suicidal or homicidal ideation and intent; (c) participation in other ongoing PTSD or SUD treatment; and (d) significant cognitive impairment. The decision to only include persons with alcohol dependence and not alcohol abuse was based on the majority of participants in the RCT 24 being diagnosed as alcohol‐dependent 80% (65/81) vs alcohol abuse 8% (7/81), and efforts to minimize confounding based on differential levels of dependence as the severity of alcohol dependence has been shown to predict goal choice (ie, abstinence vs reduced use) 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%