2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10009-017-0451-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To split or to group: from divide-and-conquer to sub-task sharing for verifying multiple properties in model checking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolation reduces the SAT formula by dismissing attackers that are outside the COI of the requirement to be verified. Isolation works similarly to COI reduction (see [13,15,7,18,14]), and it transforms Equation 4 into…”
Section: Isolation and Monotonicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Isolation reduces the SAT formula by dismissing attackers that are outside the COI of the requirement to be verified. Isolation works similarly to COI reduction (see [13,15,7,18,14]), and it transforms Equation 4 into…”
Section: Isolation and Monotonicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works by Cabodi, Camurati and Quer [15], Cabodi et. al [13], and Cabodi and Nocco [14] present several useful techniques that can be used to improve the performance of model checking when verifying multiple properties, including COI reduction and property clustering. We also mention the work by Goldberg et al [20] where they consider the problem of efficiently checking a set of safety properties P 1 to P k by individually checking each property while assuming that all other properties are valid.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work most similar to ours is a property-clustering procedure based on COI similarity [7,8]. While a similar goal, their solution requires a quadratic number of comparisons between properties, rendering it prohibitively expensive on large testbenches.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While scalable (near-linear runtime) and able to group properties with 100% affinity, in practice it is desirable to perform additional grouping of properties which have a small tolerable Hamming distance yet are still high-affinity. Again, we stress that a simple procedure of pairwise comparison to check whether properties are within a small tolerance is prohibitively slow in practice, rendering prior techniques as [7,8] unusable in practice. The following algorithms solve this goal of high-affinity group merging, with high scalability and guaranteed grouping quality.…”
Section: A Level-1 Grouping -Identical Coimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation