2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40945-020-00091-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To stimulate or not to stimulate? A rapid systematic review of repetitive sensory stimulation for the upper-limb following stroke

Abstract: Background Repetitive sensory stimulation (RSS) is a therapeutic approach which involves repeated electrical stimulation of the skin’s surface to improve function. This rapid systematic review aimed to describe the current evidence for repetitive sensory stimulation (RSS) in rehabilitation of the upper-limb for people who have had a stroke. Main text Methods: Relevant studies were identified in a systematic search of electronic databases and hand-searching in February 2020. The findings of included studies we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,37 However, evidence regarding the effects of motor rehabilitation on somatosensory recovery in people with chronic stroke is limited. 7,8,38 To our knowledge, this is the first large RCT of upper limb motor rehabilitation to report improvements in tactile sense. Notably, tactile sense improved for one-third of the participants, and improvements were sustained for at least 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…6,37 However, evidence regarding the effects of motor rehabilitation on somatosensory recovery in people with chronic stroke is limited. 7,8,38 To our knowledge, this is the first large RCT of upper limb motor rehabilitation to report improvements in tactile sense. Notably, tactile sense improved for one-third of the participants, and improvements were sustained for at least 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In relation to motor recovery, the primary rehab approach recommended by the guideline is repetitive task practice (RTP) (da Silva et al, 2020; French et al, 2016; Grattan et al, 2016; Pollock et al, 2014; Veerbeek et al, 2014a; Wattchow et al, 2018) over all other approaches including Bobath (Dorsch et al, 2023). Further, the guidelines recommend, functional electrical stimulation for wrist and finger extension (Kristensen et al, 2022; Loh et al, 2022; Tang et al, 2021; Yang et al, 2019) to enable engagement with RTP, constraint-induced movement therapy (Barzel et al, 2015; Corbetta et al, 2015; Kwakkel et al, 2015; Liu et al, 2016; Yadav et al, 2016) in those with mild-moderate weakness (see guidelines for specific parameters), and both mirror therapy (Thieme et al, 2018; Yang et al, 2018; Zeng et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2022) and mental practice (Di Rienzo et al, 2014; Barclay et al, 2020; Page and Peters, 2014; Poveda-Garcia et al, 2021; Stockley et al, 2020) as adjuncts to support RTP. Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (Ahmed et al, 2022; Xie et al, 2021; Zhao et al, 2022) has been recommended for the first time as an addition to usual therapy to enhance the effect of RTP.…”
Section: Motor Recovery and Physical Effects Of Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, manipulation of sensory input (e.g., via brief, local vibration or sensory nerve electrical stimulation) represents another neural-based strategy that may have potential to maximize strength gains. These approaches augment sensory feedback to modulate (or prime) neural excitability and can, in some instances, immediately improve performance on clinical tests of motor function in selected populations (3,46,76,81,87). However, clinical populations and those with neurological disorders are more likely to positively respond to approaches that manipulate sensory input than healthy, high-performing individuals (because of a ceiling effect in the latter population).…”
Section: Supramaximal Training Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplemental activities (used in conjunction with RE) might help to rehabilitate strength. For example, in addition to potentially maximizing strength in healthy populations, biofeedback (57) and external stimulation (8,74,87,93) might also help to rehabilitate strength capabilities in some clinical contexts. That stated, the associated nuance and necessary clinical judgement prevents detailed recommendations.…”
Section: Supplemental Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%